Association between Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and female breast cancer based on NHANES data (2001–2018): A cross-sectional study

Worldwide cancer statistics have shown that breast cancer dominates female cancer incidence and remains a leading cause of death. The Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) is a new prognostic indicator of systemic inflammation used to assess systemic immune-inflammatory response levels in the human body. It is associated with the prognosis of various diseases, such as malignant tumors, cardiovascular diseases, and autoimmune diseases. Although SII offers valuable information for diagnosing and predicting the risk of female breast cancer (FBC), the association between SII and FBC has not yet been analyzed. Therefore, the relationship between SII and FBC was investigated in this study. Multivariate logistic regression, model fit assessment using Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), and smoothing curve fitting were applied to examine the correlation between SII and FBC using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001-2018. Then the stability of their association was further examined using subgroup analysis and interaction tests among populations. Results showed a positive correlation between SII and FBC in 17,044 participants with age ≥ 20 years. In the fully adjusted model, every 100-unit increase in SII was accompanied by a 3% increased odds of FBC prevalence [OR = 1.03 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.05)]. Individuals in the highest quartile of SII exhibited 44% increased odds of FBC prevalence than those in the lowest quartile [OR = 1.44 (95% CI: 1.11, 1.88)]. Model fitness assessment using AIC and BIC criteria demonstrated that multivariable-adjusted models exhibited better fit compared to unadjusted models for both continuous and categorical SII specifications. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated that SII exhibited excellent diagnostic capability for breast cancer, with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.816 (95% CI: 0.801-0.831), comparable to NLR (AUC = 0.816) and neutrophil counts (AUC = 0.815). In disease-specific performance comparison, SII's predictive ability for breast cancer (AUC = 0.816) was slightly superior to that for hypertension (AUC = 0.799), with the difference being statistically significant (P = 0.0407). Our findings confirmed that SII was a promising biomarker associated with FBC prevalence, and it may provide valuable insights into early screening and personalized treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330571
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association between Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and female breast cancer based on NHANES data (2001–2018): A cross-sectional study

Deju Zhang, Ying Yuan, Chuntao Quan, Ni Xie et al.
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
1.05
article

Association between Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and female breast cancer based on NHANES data (2001–2018): A cross-sectional study

Deju Zhang, Ying Yuan, Chuntao Quan, Ni Xie, Juan Xiong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Worldwide cancer statistics have shown that breast cancer dominates female cancer incidence and remains a leading cause of death. The Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) is a new prognostic indicator of systemic inflammation used to assess systemic immune-inflammatory response levels in the human body. It is associated with the prognosis of various diseases, such as malignant tumors, cardiovascular diseases, and autoimmune diseases. Although SII offers valuable information for diagnosing and predicting the risk of female breast cancer (FBC), the association between SII and FBC has not yet been analyzed. Therefore, the relationship between SII and FBC was investigated in this study. Multivariate logistic regression, model fit assessment using Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), and smoothing curve fitting were applied to examine the correlation between SII and FBC using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001-2018. Then the stability of their association was further examined using subgroup analysis and interaction tests among populations. Results showed a positive correlation between SII and FBC in 17,044 participants with age ≥ 20 years. In the fully adjusted model, every 100-unit increase in SII was accompanied by a 3% increased odds of FBC prevalence [OR = 1.03 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.05)]. Individuals in the highest quartile of SII exhibited 44% increased odds of FBC prevalence than those in the lowest quartile [OR = 1.44 (95% CI: 1.11, 1.88)]. Model fitness assessment using AIC and BIC criteria demonstrated that multivariable-adjusted models exhibited better fit compared to unadjusted models for both continuous and categorical SII specifications. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated that SII exhibited excellent diagnostic capability for breast cancer, with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.816 (95% CI: 0.801-0.831), comparable to NLR (AUC = 0.816) and neutrophil counts (AUC = 0.815). In disease-specific performance comparison, SII's predictive ability for breast cancer (AUC = 0.816) was slightly superior to that for hypertension (AUC = 0.799), with the difference being statistically significant (P = 0.0407). Our findings confirmed that SII was a promising biomarker associated with FBC prevalence, and it may provide valuable insights into early screening and personalized treatment strategies.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(9)
Deyang Stomatological Hospital (CN), Shenzhen Second People's Hospital (CN), University of South China (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Shenzhen City, National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.