Machine Learning and Security Fake Email Detection and Intrusion Detection

This research investigates the application of Machine Learning (ML) techniques in two distinct security contexts: phishing detection and intrusion detection systems (IDS). The study demonstrates the effectiveness of ML models in classifying anomalies and patterns based on user-defined rules, significantly reducing the need for human intervention in data analysis. The methodology involved data collection, cleaning, feature selection, ML algorithm selection, model training, and fine-tuning. Results indicated a 90% ACC in phishing detection and 95% precision in IDS, with Decision Tree (DT) and Random Forest (RF) emerging as the best classifiers. However, challenges included data availability, cleaning, and variable selection requiring domain expertise. The evolving nature of security threats also affects the accuracy of supervised models. Future work involves deploying ML models in production for continuous learning and exploring advanced techniques like Adversarial Learning for improved classification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/incet64471.2025.11140784
Primary Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning and Security Fake Email Detection and Intrusion Detection

P. Thilagavathi, R. Geetha, D. V. Lalitha Parameswari, Jose Anand A. et al.
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
article

Machine Learning and Security Fake Email Detection and Intrusion Detection

P. Thilagavathi, R. Geetha, D. V. Lalitha Parameswari, Jose Anand A., Anitha Govindaram, Sean T. Hannah
article en

Abstract

This research investigates the application of Machine Learning (ML) techniques in two distinct security contexts: phishing detection and intrusion detection systems (IDS). The study demonstrates the effectiveness of ML models in classifying anomalies and patterns based on user-defined rules, significantly reducing the need for human intervention in data analysis. The methodology involved data collection, cleaning, feature selection, ML algorithm selection, model training, and fine-tuning. Results indicated a 90% ACC in phishing detection and 95% precision in IDS, with Decision Tree (DT) and Random Forest (RF) emerging as the best classifiers. However, challenges included data availability, cleaning, and variable selection requiring domain expertise. The evolving nature of security threats also affects the accuracy of supervised models. Future work involves deploying ML models in production for continuous learning and exploring advanced techniques like Adversarial Learning for improved classification.

Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology (IN), SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN), Vinayaka Missions University (IN), GS Engineering (United States) (US), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada) (CA), Institute of Science and Technology, Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Machine Learning and Security Fake Email Detection and Intrusion Detection — P. Thilagavathi, R. Geetha, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS