Development of a Predictive Wear Model Based on Test Data Using Machine Learning Algorithms

This study explores the application of machine learning algorithms to predict abrasive wear based on the chemical composition and hardness of materials, validated through tests using ASTM G-65 standards. Three models— Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Extreme Learning Machines (ELM), and k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN)—were evaluated for their accuracy and computational efficiency. ANN emerged as the most accurate model, achieving 85.75% accuracy with an absolute mean error of 0.228 g and a root mean square error of 0.294 g, demonstrating effective learning and error reduction. ELM showed comparable performance with less parameter tuning but required significant computational resources at higher neuron counts. In contrast, KNN, while computationally simpler, was unable to model complex relationships, converging to average wear values. The findings validate the potential of machine learning in the prediction of wear for component recovery industries. Future research should expand datasets and explore diverse wear conditions to enhance model reliability and industrial applicability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/incet64471.2025.11140322
Primary Topic
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a Predictive Wear Model Based on Test Data Using Machine Learning Algorithms

C. Anbu, Prashant Kumar Shukla, L. P. Sajitha, Gotte Ranjith Kumar et al.
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
article

Development of a Predictive Wear Model Based on Test Data Using Machine Learning Algorithms

C. Anbu, Prashant Kumar Shukla, L. P. Sajitha, Gotte Ranjith Kumar, Dhivakar Poospadi, Nandhini S. N
article en

Abstract

This study explores the application of machine learning algorithms to predict abrasive wear based on the chemical composition and hardness of materials, validated through tests using ASTM G-65 standards. Three models— Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Extreme Learning Machines (ELM), and k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN)—were evaluated for their accuracy and computational efficiency. ANN emerged as the most accurate model, achieving 85.75% accuracy with an absolute mean error of 0.228 g and a root mean square error of 0.294 g, demonstrating effective learning and error reduction. ELM showed comparable performance with less parameter tuning but required significant computational resources at higher neuron counts. In contrast, KNN, while computationally simpler, was unable to model complex relationships, converging to average wear values. The findings validate the potential of machine learning in the prediction of wear for component recovery industries. Future research should expand datasets and explore diverse wear conditions to enhance model reliability and industrial applicability.

Central University of Tamil Nadu (IN), Dr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute (IN), Global Services (Slovakia) (SK), Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.