Two Strategies for Reactive Power Partitioning in a Wind Farm to Satisfy the TSO Requirements and Assessment of Distribution Line Losses

This paper investigates the effects of two strategies for partitioning the reactive power among the wind turbines of a 90 MVA wind farm located in Southern Italy. The wind farm participates in the voltage regulation service and must meet a minimum reactive power requirement set by the Italian Transmission System Operator (TSO). The first partitioning strategy tested evenly distributes the reactive power among all wind turbines. The other partitioning strategy that assigns each wind turbine 90% of its maximum reactive power capacity, starting from the closest one to the grid connection point, until the total requirement is met. Simulations are performed to evaluate the ability of the wind farm to maintain the required reactive power while keeping the voltage within ±10% of the nominal voltage and remaining inside the wind turbines' reactive power capability curves. The performance of both strategies is compared in terms of meeting the TSO's reactive power requirements, voltage limitations, and Joule losses in the distribution network. The results indicate that the even distribution strategy has lower Joule losses while keeping the voltage ranges, making it the most effective approach. In contrast, the second strategy, although fulfilling the reactive power requirement, results in slightly higher energy losses. Therefore, the even partitioning strategy offers better balance of performance, simplicity, and efficiency for managing reactive power in the wind farm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccep65222.2025.11143746
Primary Topic
Power Systems and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two Strategies for Reactive Power Partitioning in a Wind Farm to Satisfy the TSO Requirements and Assessment of Distribution Line Losses

Alessandro Ciocia, Gabriele Malgaroli, Gianfranco Chicco, Filippo Spertino et al.
Power Systems and Technologies
article

Two Strategies for Reactive Power Partitioning in a Wind Farm to Satisfy the TSO Requirements and Assessment of Distribution Line Losses

Alessandro Ciocia, Gabriele Malgaroli, Gianfranco Chicco, Filippo Spertino, Maria Lara Travaglini
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of two strategies for partitioning the reactive power among the wind turbines of a 90 MVA wind farm located in Southern Italy. The wind farm participates in the voltage regulation service and must meet a minimum reactive power requirement set by the Italian Transmission System Operator (TSO). The first partitioning strategy tested evenly distributes the reactive power among all wind turbines. The other partitioning strategy that assigns each wind turbine 90% of its maximum reactive power capacity, starting from the closest one to the grid connection point, until the total requirement is met. Simulations are performed to evaluate the ability of the wind farm to maintain the required reactive power while keeping the voltage within ±10% of the nominal voltage and remaining inside the wind turbines' reactive power capability curves. The performance of both strategies is compared in terms of meeting the TSO's reactive power requirements, voltage limitations, and Joule losses in the distribution network. The results indicate that the even distribution strategy has lower Joule losses while keeping the voltage ranges, making it the most effective approach. In contrast, the second strategy, although fulfilling the reactive power requirement, results in slightly higher energy losses. Therefore, the even partitioning strategy offers better balance of performance, simplicity, and efficiency for managing reactive power in the wind farm.

Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Power Systems and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.