William James’ Debt to Hermann Lotze

The purpose of this article is to investigate the impact of Rudolph Hermann Lotze’s ideas on William James. The article will show that several core concepts in James’s The Principles of Psychology (1890) have been inspired by Lotze’s work. Both authors notably agree that psychology is not a natural science. They express a sharp criticism of scientific psychology and of the associationist view of the mind. Lotze’s arguments also underpin James’s theories of ideomotor action, of emotions and of local signs. In short, James draws heavily on Lotze’s philosophy to formulate many of the original claims in The Principles of Psychology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geltung - Revista de Estudos das Origens da Filosofia Contemporânea
Published
2025-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23925/2764-0892.2025.v4.n1.e71539
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Institutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

William James’ Debt to Hermann Lotze

Michele Vagnetti
Geltung - Revista de Estudos das Origens da Filosofia Contemporânea
Economic Theory and Institutions
article

William James’ Debt to Hermann Lotze

Michele Vagnetti
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to investigate the impact of Rudolph Hermann Lotze’s ideas on William James. The article will show that several core concepts in James’s The Principles of Psychology (1890) have been inspired by Lotze’s work. Both authors notably agree that psychology is not a natural science. They express a sharp criticism of scientific psychology and of the associationist view of the mind. Lotze’s arguments also underpin James’s theories of ideomotor action, of emotions and of local signs. In short, James draws heavily on Lotze’s philosophy to formulate many of the original claims in The Principles of Psychology.

Geltung - Revista de Estudos das Origens da Filosofia ContemporâneaVol. 4(1)
Paderborn University (DE)
University of Oxford
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Economic Theory and Institutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.