Using Artificial Intelligence to Evaluate Employees: The Effects on Recruitment, Effort, and Retention

ABSTRACT We use multiple experiments to explore the effects of artificial intelligence (AI) in employee evaluations and whether these effects differ based on employee demographics. Experiment 1 investigates whether having AI—as opposed to a White male manager—conduct employee performance evaluations affects firms’ recruiting efforts. We find that AI evaluators appear equally attractive to prospective employees from different demographic groups, whereas White male evaluators appear less attractive to under-represented minorities. Experiment 2 examines how current employees respond to receiving negative performance evaluations. We find that, after a negative performance evaluation, under-represented minorities provide less effort compared with White males under White male evaluators, but this difference is eliminated under AI evaluators. Collectively, our results provide evidence of costs and benefits related to the use of AI in performance evaluations and that, overall, this use differentially affects employees of different demographics. Data Availability: Data are available upon request. JEL Classifications: M12; M14; M41; M52.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management Accounting Research
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-2024-009
Citations
2
Primary Topic
AI and HR Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Artificial Intelligence to Evaluate Employees: The Effects on Recruitment, Effort, and Retention

Joseph Burke, Jason Brown, Ángela Sauciuc
2 citations
Journal of Management Accounting Research
AI and HR Technologies
5.53
article

Using Artificial Intelligence to Evaluate Employees: The Effects on Recruitment, Effort, and Retention

Joseph Burke, Jason Brown, Ángela Sauciuc
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT We use multiple experiments to explore the effects of artificial intelligence (AI) in employee evaluations and whether these effects differ based on employee demographics. Experiment 1 investigates whether having AI—as opposed to a White male manager—conduct employee performance evaluations affects firms’ recruiting efforts. We find that AI evaluators appear equally attractive to prospective employees from different demographic groups, whereas White male evaluators appear less attractive to under-represented minorities. Experiment 2 examines how current employees respond to receiving negative performance evaluations. We find that, after a negative performance evaluation, under-represented minorities provide less effort compared with White males under White male evaluators, but this difference is eliminated under AI evaluators. Collectively, our results provide evidence of costs and benefits related to the use of AI in performance evaluations and that, overall, this use differentially affects employees of different demographics. Data Availability: Data are available upon request. JEL Classifications: M12; M14; M41; M52.

Journal of Management Accounting ResearchVol. 38(1)
Indiana University Bloomington (US), Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
AI and HR Technologies
5.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.