The propositional meaning of metaphor: A critical review against the Davidsonian approach

The non-cognitive content account by Donald Davidson ascribes metaphor to the domain of use and asserts that metaphors only have literal meanings. We argue that the Davidsonian approach cannot elucidate the way information is conveyed. Davidson and his supporters’ arguments fail to capture the nature of similes and dead metaphors. From their perspective, metaphor understanding is attributed merely to its aesthetic aspect. We contend that metaphors can not only evoke experience but also communicate knowledge. We address the deficiency of the Davidsonian account through dead metaphor, simile and aesthetic properties. Structure mapping theory and research on embodiment can provide novel insights into the meaning-construction underlying metaphor comprehension. Emphasizing the cognitive account, we posit a paradigm of proposition construction procedure underpinning metaphor comprehension. • Metaphors have cognitive content. • Metaphors, similes and anormal strings form a spectrum. • Structure-mapping as a tool to retrieve the intended meaning of metaphor. • Duality in metaphor processing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language & Communication
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2025.08.002
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The propositional meaning of metaphor: A critical review against the Davidsonian approach

Shunkai Wang
2 citations
Language & Communication
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
4.24
article

The propositional meaning of metaphor: A critical review against the Davidsonian approach

Shunkai Wang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The non-cognitive content account by Donald Davidson ascribes metaphor to the domain of use and asserts that metaphors only have literal meanings. We argue that the Davidsonian approach cannot elucidate the way information is conveyed. Davidson and his supporters’ arguments fail to capture the nature of similes and dead metaphors. From their perspective, metaphor understanding is attributed merely to its aesthetic aspect. We contend that metaphors can not only evoke experience but also communicate knowledge. We address the deficiency of the Davidsonian account through dead metaphor, simile and aesthetic properties. Structure mapping theory and research on embodiment can provide novel insights into the meaning-construction underlying metaphor comprehension. Emphasizing the cognitive account, we posit a paradigm of proposition construction procedure underpinning metaphor comprehension. • Metaphors have cognitive content. • Metaphors, similes and anormal strings form a spectrum. • Structure-mapping as a tool to retrieve the intended meaning of metaphor. • Duality in metaphor processing.

Language & CommunicationVol. 105
Ajuntament de L’Hospitalet (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
4.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.