Iliofemoral endarterectomy and stenting improves mid-term patency for advanced aortoiliac disease with concomitant common femoral disease
ObjectiveCombined iliofemoral endarterectomy and iliac stenting (IFE + S) is a proven surgical approach for TransAtlantic Inter-society Consensus (TASC) C and D aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). Iliac stenting alone (ISA) may be an attractive, minimally invasive option in select cases; however, untreated moderate-to-severe common femoral disease may threaten iliac stent patency and limit symptom improvement. This study evaluates the mid-term patency rates after IFE + S versus ISA for TASC C and D AIOD as well as the rate of interval femoral endarterectomies in those who underwent ISA.MethodsThis is a retrospective, single-center analysis of patients from 2011 to 2018 with TASC C or D AIOD and concomitant femoral artery stenosis of >50% who underwent IFE + S or ISA. Baseline lesion and patient characteristics such as TASC classification, degree of stenosis, calcification severity, lesion length, and baseline ankle-brachial index (ABI) were collected. Primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates were calculated over three years with Kaplan-Meier estimates. The rate of interval femoral endarterectomies in the ISA cohort was measured at the same time endpoint.ResultsOf the 78 limbs identified, 64 (82.1%) underwent IFE + S and 14 (17.9%) underwent ISA. No significant differences in aortoiliac or femoral lesion characteristics existed. Iliac stent primary patency was significantly improved in the IFE + S group at three years [85.1% versus 55.6%, HR 3.96 (95% CI 1.54, 10.2, p = .004)]. Primary-assisted and secondary patency rates were not significantly different. Five (35.7%) patients in the ISA cohort required an interval femoral endarterectomy for ischemic symptoms over the three-year endpoint.<b>Conclusions:</b> In select patient populations with concomitant TASC C or D AIOD and common femoral artery disease, IFE + S may provide improved mid-term primary stent patency when compared to ISA. A subset of patients who undergo ISA may require future femoral endarterectomies for ischemic symptoms.
Authors
- Nicholas G. Hoell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6958-8867)
- Alice Alexander (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1979-320X)
- Jon G. Quatromoni
- Sean P. Lyden (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1666-017X)
- Natasha Ahuja (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0687-588X)
- Ali Khalifeh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1420-2669)
- Ravi N. Ambani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1825-3593)
- Nathan J. Reinert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6764-5522)
- Francis J. Caputo
- James Bena (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7592-0480)
- Courtney Hanak
- Andrew H. Smith (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8558-5818)
- Levester Kirksey
Institutions
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- Cleveland Foundation (US)
- Bridgeport Hospital (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Vascular
- Published
- 2025-09-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381251377294
- Primary Topic
- Peripheral Artery Disease Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00