Biofeedback and Neurofeedback in the Clinical Setting: A Review of Their Application and Ef-ficacy in Neurological and Psychiatric Condi-tions

Abstract: Neurological and psychiatric disorders frequently present with treatment-refractory symptoms, creating a significant demand for effective non-pharmacological interventions. Biofeedback and neurofeedback have emerged as prominent modalities, yet their utility remains contentious due to a landscape of varied protocols and conflicting research findings. This review aims to provide a critical, evidence-based synthesis of their application and efficacy to guide clinical decision-making. The methodology involved a search of high-level evidence, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, from the PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library prioritizing publications from the last 15 years. The results indicate a robust evidence base for peripheral biofeedback in migraine management and for sensorimotor rhythm and slow cortical potential (SCP) neurofeedback in refractory epilepsy, with the latter demonstrating remarkable long-term durability. Heart Rate Variability (HRV) biofeedback shows strong efficacy for anxiety and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). In contrast, the evidence for theta/beta neurofeedback in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is highly contested due to fundamental methodological issues with rater blinding, and frontal alpha asymmetry neurofeedback for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is undermined by a significant replication crisis concerning its foundational biomarker. It is concluded that while biofeedback and neurofeedback provide solid, evidence-based interventions for select conditions, the broader field is hampered by a lack of protocol standardization and significant methodological challenges. The future of these therapies is contingent on a paradigm shift towards a precision-medicine model, leveraging rigorous research to identify predictive biomarkers and determine for whom these therapies are most effective

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Health Sciences Review
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70164/ihsr.v1i4.39
Primary Topic
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biofeedback and Neurofeedback in the Clinical Setting: A Review of Their Application and Ef-ficacy in Neurological and Psychiatric Condi-tions

Fernanda Coelho, Alexandre de Mendonça, Diogo Nunes Melo, Fernanda C. Dos Santos et al.
International Health Sciences Review
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
article

Biofeedback and Neurofeedback in the Clinical Setting: A Review of Their Application and Ef-ficacy in Neurological and Psychiatric Condi-tions

Fernanda Coelho, Alexandre de Mendonça, Diogo Nunes Melo, Fernanda C. Dos Santos, Gabriel Maia Teixeira, Valdir Antônio Rodrigues Júnior
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Neurological and psychiatric disorders frequently present with treatment-refractory symptoms, creating a significant demand for effective non-pharmacological interventions. Biofeedback and neurofeedback have emerged as prominent modalities, yet their utility remains contentious due to a landscape of varied protocols and conflicting research findings. This review aims to provide a critical, evidence-based synthesis of their application and efficacy to guide clinical decision-making. The methodology involved a search of high-level evidence, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, from the PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library prioritizing publications from the last 15 years. The results indicate a robust evidence base for peripheral biofeedback in migraine management and for sensorimotor rhythm and slow cortical potential (SCP) neurofeedback in refractory epilepsy, with the latter demonstrating remarkable long-term durability. Heart Rate Variability (HRV) biofeedback shows strong efficacy for anxiety and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). In contrast, the evidence for theta/beta neurofeedback in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is highly contested due to fundamental methodological issues with rater blinding, and frontal alpha asymmetry neurofeedback for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is undermined by a significant replication crisis concerning its foundational biomarker. It is concluded that while biofeedback and neurofeedback provide solid, evidence-based interventions for select conditions, the broader field is hampered by a lack of protocol standardization and significant methodological challenges. The future of these therapies is contingent on a paradigm shift towards a precision-medicine model, leveraging rigorous research to identify predictive biomarkers and determine for whom these therapies are most effective

International Health Sciences ReviewVol. 1(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.