Balancing grazing and biodiversity: Arthropod responses to modern cattle farming practices

Ruminant production exerts severe pressure on ecosystems through land use change for pasture and fodder production, contributing to biodiversity loss, disruption of natural biogeochemical fluxes, and climate change. Whereas ruminant production can support biodiversity that has co-evolved with grasslands and grazing animals, the values of temporary grasslands are poorly understood. In this study, we assessed the effects of grazing regimes practised on modern cattle farms, including no grazing, on the abundance, biomass, and taxonomic richness of aerial and ground-dwelling arthropods. We assessed the potential value of organic management compared to grazing on conventional farms, and the role of vegetation structure on the pastures. We sampled arthropods in temporary pastures and silage grasslands, spring cereal fields, and in farmyards on 43 dairy and suckler cow farms in Finland. We show that grazing benefits the richness of ground-dwelling arthropods in fields, and the benefits were most evident at extensive levels of grazing at the farm scale. Grazing had no significant benefits for the biomass of ground-dwelling arthropods or relative abundance of aerial arthropods over field vegetation. Grazed rotational grasslands had similar levels of arthropods as mown grasslands or cereal crops, except for a higher richness of ground-dwelling arthropods. Taxonomic richness of ground-dwelling arthropods was higher on organic farms than conventional, but only at low grazing intensities. Although our study suggests several ways in which livestock farmers can maintain and increase arthropod populations on their farms, these may be associated with some reduction in production output on modern farms oriented towards high yields. • Arthropods were surveyed on 43 organic and conventional cattle farms under contrasted grazing regimes in Finland. • Family richness of ground-dwelling arthropods was lower on farms with no grazing. • Biomass of ground-dwelling and abundance of aerial arthropods were not related to grazing regime. • Taxonomic richness of ground-dwelling arthropods was higher on organic farms than conventional. • Biodiversity benefits were the highest at low levels of grazing intensity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.109942
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing grazing and biodiversity: Arthropod responses to modern cattle farming practices

Johan Ekroos, Irina Herzon, Laura Bosco, Andrea Santangeli et al.
1 citations
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Fire effects on ecosystems
1.11
article

Balancing grazing and biodiversity: Arthropod responses to modern cattle farming practices

Johan Ekroos, Irina Herzon, Laura Bosco, Andrea Santangeli, Helena Wirta, Aleksi Lehikoinen, Sanna Mäkeläinen, Venla Saaristo, Torgny Backman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Ruminant production exerts severe pressure on ecosystems through land use change for pasture and fodder production, contributing to biodiversity loss, disruption of natural biogeochemical fluxes, and climate change. Whereas ruminant production can support biodiversity that has co-evolved with grasslands and grazing animals, the values of temporary grasslands are poorly understood. In this study, we assessed the effects of grazing regimes practised on modern cattle farms, including no grazing, on the abundance, biomass, and taxonomic richness of aerial and ground-dwelling arthropods. We assessed the potential value of organic management compared to grazing on conventional farms, and the role of vegetation structure on the pastures. We sampled arthropods in temporary pastures and silage grasslands, spring cereal fields, and in farmyards on 43 dairy and suckler cow farms in Finland. We show that grazing benefits the richness of ground-dwelling arthropods in fields, and the benefits were most evident at extensive levels of grazing at the farm scale. Grazing had no significant benefits for the biomass of ground-dwelling arthropods or relative abundance of aerial arthropods over field vegetation. Grazed rotational grasslands had similar levels of arthropods as mown grasslands or cereal crops, except for a higher richness of ground-dwelling arthropods. Taxonomic richness of ground-dwelling arthropods was higher on organic farms than conventional, but only at low grazing intensities. Although our study suggests several ways in which livestock farmers can maintain and increase arthropod populations on their farms, these may be associated with some reduction in production output on modern farms oriented towards high yields. • Arthropods were surveyed on 43 organic and conventional cattle farms under contrasted grazing regimes in Finland. • Family richness of ground-dwelling arthropods was lower on farms with no grazing. • Biomass of ground-dwelling and abundance of aerial arthropods were not related to grazing regime. • Taxonomic richness of ground-dwelling arthropods was higher on organic farms than conventional. • Biodiversity benefits were the highest at low levels of grazing intensity.

Agriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentVol. 395
University of Helsinki (FI), Mediterranean Institute for Advanced Studies (ES), Finnish Museum of Natural History (FI), Umeå University (SE)
Maj ja Tor Nesslingin Säätiö, Koneen Säätiö, Valio, Societas pro Fauna et Flora Fennica
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Fire effects on ecosystems
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.