The deep approach to learning as a measure of quality education in accreditation

Purpose This paper aims to offer an alternative approach to traditional accreditation processes for measuring the quality of learning in higher education. The paper emphasizes identifying specific learning environment variables that foster deep learning and demonstrable learning outcomes. Design/methodology/approach A survey of 873 students from public and private colleges was conducted. The relationship between the antecedents and consequences of a deep approach to learning was hypothesized using a conceptual model. Findings Learning environment variables like motivation, self-efficacy, curriculum and assessment emerged as robust predictors of deep learning, which in turn led to improved learning outcomes. Practical implications The implications extend beyond the academic realm, informing policy and accreditation frameworks aimed at fostering an enriched and effective learning environment. This paper advocates for the integration of student learning to provide a more nuanced and accurate understanding of educational quality. Originality/value The originality lies in the critical evaluation of traditional accreditation as the primary means of measuring the quality of learning in higher education and its proposition of a complementary approach focused directly on assessing the depth of student learning. This focus on the antecedents and consequences of deep learning, as a complementary lens to accreditation, constitutes a significant contribution to the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality Assurance in Education
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/qae-04-2025-0088
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The deep approach to learning as a measure of quality education in accreditation

Priya Chaudhary, Reetesh K. Singh
Quality Assurance in Education
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
article

The deep approach to learning as a measure of quality education in accreditation

Priya Chaudhary, Reetesh K. Singh
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to offer an alternative approach to traditional accreditation processes for measuring the quality of learning in higher education. The paper emphasizes identifying specific learning environment variables that foster deep learning and demonstrable learning outcomes. Design/methodology/approach A survey of 873 students from public and private colleges was conducted. The relationship between the antecedents and consequences of a deep approach to learning was hypothesized using a conceptual model. Findings Learning environment variables like motivation, self-efficacy, curriculum and assessment emerged as robust predictors of deep learning, which in turn led to improved learning outcomes. Practical implications The implications extend beyond the academic realm, informing policy and accreditation frameworks aimed at fostering an enriched and effective learning environment. This paper advocates for the integration of student learning to provide a more nuanced and accurate understanding of educational quality. Originality/value The originality lies in the critical evaluation of traditional accreditation as the primary means of measuring the quality of learning in higher education and its proposition of a complementary approach focused directly on assessing the depth of student learning. This focus on the antecedents and consequences of deep learning, as a complementary lens to accreditation, constitutes a significant contribution to the field.

Quality Assurance in EducationVol. 34(1)
University of Delhi (IN), International Management Institute (IN), Centre for Development Economics (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.