Rewilding and forest recreational value: A choice experiment analysis of the impact of large herbivores and fences in nature management

Grazing and browsing by large herbivores is increasingly being used as a management tool to promote biodiversity. While research has explored their ecological impact, less attention has been given to their effects on the recreational value of nature areas. Given the importance of outdoor recreation for societal welfare, it is crucial to understand how the presence of large herbivores affect recreationists and whether potential negative effects can be mitigated. In a discrete choice experiment among nearly 2900 respondents in Denmark, we investigate the impact of the presence of herbivores and fences on the recreational value of forests. Based on multinomial and mixed logit models, we show that the tree species type, stand age structure, herbivore species, dog access, the number of access roads through a fence and distance significantly influence willingness to travel, whereas the type of access point and fence height are only of limited importance. Herbivore species differ in their impact, with red deer being the most preferred and domesticated livestock least favored. Using a latent class model, we show a minority (11 %) of respondents strongly preferring to visit a forest without large herbivores and fences, while the majority show a positive preference. The results also show that allowing dogs to the forest is crucial for approximately 15 % of respondents. In conclusion, we find that the presence of herbivores and related consequences for access and fencing leads to an aggregated welfare loss for a minority of the population, whereas the majority experience a welfare gain. • Herbivore species type in rewilding affect the recreational value of forests. • Majority of Danes would visit forests with large herbivores and fences. • 11 % lose welfare with the introduction of herbivores and fences. • 15 % base their forest choice on whether dogs are allowed in the forest. • Fence height and access points are of limited significance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2025.100934
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rewilding and forest recreational value: A choice experiment analysis of the impact of large herbivores and fences in nature management

Jette Bredahl Jacobsen, Christian Gamborg, Thomas Lundhede, Frank Søndergaard Jensen et al.
2 citations
Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism
Economic and Environmental Valuation
6.26
article

Rewilding and forest recreational value: A choice experiment analysis of the impact of large herbivores and fences in nature management

Jette Bredahl Jacobsen, Christian Gamborg, Thomas Lundhede, Frank Søndergaard Jensen, Tim de Kruiff
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Grazing and browsing by large herbivores is increasingly being used as a management tool to promote biodiversity. While research has explored their ecological impact, less attention has been given to their effects on the recreational value of nature areas. Given the importance of outdoor recreation for societal welfare, it is crucial to understand how the presence of large herbivores affect recreationists and whether potential negative effects can be mitigated. In a discrete choice experiment among nearly 2900 respondents in Denmark, we investigate the impact of the presence of herbivores and fences on the recreational value of forests. Based on multinomial and mixed logit models, we show that the tree species type, stand age structure, herbivore species, dog access, the number of access roads through a fence and distance significantly influence willingness to travel, whereas the type of access point and fence height are only of limited importance. Herbivore species differ in their impact, with red deer being the most preferred and domesticated livestock least favored. Using a latent class model, we show a minority (11 %) of respondents strongly preferring to visit a forest without large herbivores and fences, while the majority show a positive preference. The results also show that allowing dogs to the forest is crucial for approximately 15 % of respondents. In conclusion, we find that the presence of herbivores and related consequences for access and fencing leads to an aggregated welfare loss for a minority of the population, whereas the majority experience a welfare gain. • Herbivore species type in rewilding affect the recreational value of forests. • Majority of Danes would visit forests with large herbivores and fences. • 11 % lose welfare with the introduction of herbivores and fences. • 15 % base their forest choice on whether dogs are allowed in the forest. • Fence height and access points are of limited significance.

Journal of Outdoor Recreation and TourismVol. 52
Københavns Universitet, Miljøministeriet, Ministry of Environment
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.