A systematic scoping review of measures used to evaluate treatment-induced changes in depression, anxiety, and chronic stress in people with post-stroke aphasia

Measures used to evaluate treatment-induced changes in depression, anxiety, and chronic stress in people with aphasia varied widely across studies. This variability may stem from a lack of validated measures available for this population and/or the absence of best practice recommendations for measuring mental health outcomes in people with aphasia. Given these limitations, caution is urged when interpreting treatment studies using current measures, and there is an urgent need for valid and reliable self-report measures specifically designed with and tested for people with aphasia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aphasiology
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2025.2467234
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic scoping review of measures used to evaluate treatment-induced changes in depression, anxiety, and chronic stress in people with post-stroke aphasia

Tyler B. Smith, Jennifer David, Richard Arenas, Davin K. Quinn et al.
1 citations
Aphasiology
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
1.03
article

A systematic scoping review of measures used to evaluate treatment-induced changes in depression, anxiety, and chronic stress in people with post-stroke aphasia

Tyler B. Smith, Jennifer David, Richard Arenas, Davin K. Quinn, Jessica D. Richardson, Honey Isabel Hubbard, Christie Carroll-Duhigg
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Measures used to evaluate treatment-induced changes in depression, anxiety, and chronic stress in people with aphasia varied widely across studies. This variability may stem from a lack of validated measures available for this population and/or the absence of best practice recommendations for measuring mental health outcomes in people with aphasia. Given these limitations, caution is urged when interpreting treatment studies using current measures, and there is an urgent need for valid and reliable self-report measures specifically designed with and tested for people with aphasia.

AphasiologyVol. 40(4)
University of New Mexico (US), The Recovery Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
1.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.