A Scoping Review of Literacy Interventions Using Signed Languages for School-Age Deaf Students

This scoping review systematically analyzes the nature and implications of existing research on literacy and literacy interventions that use a signed language among deaf students from preschool through college. We identified the findings associated with the use of sign languages on literacy outcomes for deaf students, and we analyzed the scope of the identified studies to uncover potential gaps in the research base. Fifteen empirical studies published between 2014 and 2025 met the inclusion criteria, featuring participants across a range of educational levels. Methodologies varied, with qualitative and group comparison designs most common. Studies addressed key literacy components (i.e., phonological awareness, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, and composition) and findings indicate that integrating sign language into literacy instruction enhances language access and supports literacy learning. The results highlight the importance of responsive, multimodal instruction and point to the need for further research to fill identified gaps.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15081104
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Scoping Review of Literacy Interventions Using Signed Languages for School-Age Deaf Students

Christopher M. Black, Hannah M. Dostal, Marissa D Chappell, Jessica Scott
1 citations
Behavioral Sciences
Hearing Impairment and Communication
3.44
article

A Scoping Review of Literacy Interventions Using Signed Languages for School-Age Deaf Students

Christopher M. Black, Hannah M. Dostal, Marissa D Chappell, Jessica Scott
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This scoping review systematically analyzes the nature and implications of existing research on literacy and literacy interventions that use a signed language among deaf students from preschool through college. We identified the findings associated with the use of sign languages on literacy outcomes for deaf students, and we analyzed the scope of the identified studies to uncover potential gaps in the research base. Fifteen empirical studies published between 2014 and 2025 met the inclusion criteria, featuring participants across a range of educational levels. Methodologies varied, with qualitative and group comparison designs most common. Studies addressed key literacy components (i.e., phonological awareness, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, and composition) and findings indicate that integrating sign language into literacy instruction enhances language access and supports literacy learning. The results highlight the importance of responsive, multimodal instruction and point to the need for further research to fill identified gaps.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 15(8)
University of Connecticut (US), Georgia State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Scoping Review of Literacy Interventions Using Signed Languages for School-Age Deaf Students — Christopher M. Black, Hannah M. Dostal, et al. · Behavioral Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS