Descriptions of Spirituality among the American Public: The Relationship between Spiritual Salience and Specific Spiritual Understandings

Social work's ethical and professional standards underscore the importance of engaging spirituality in practice settings, but relatively little research has appeared in the profession's literature equipping practitioners to address client spirituality. To alleviate this gap, this nationally representative study determined (a) the prevalence of 14 different understandings or descriptions of spirituality among American adults and (b) the relationship between the self-ascribed salience or importance of spirituality (and religion) and specific understandings of spirituality. The most widely endorsed description of what spirituality offered respondents was peace (65.9 percent) and the least widely endorsed was structure (23.5 percent). Self-reported importance of spirituality (but not religion) was positively associated with all 14 understandings of spirituality. The results suggest that practitioners should incorporate a measure of spiritual salience into their initial brief assessment. In situations where the results of the brief assessment suggest a more in-depth exploration of spirituality is indicated, the understandings of spirituality discussed in this study provide practitioners with a working template of specific perceptions that can be explored with clients and, potentially, leveraged to assist clients ameliorate the challenges they experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health & Social Work
Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlaf029
Primary Topic
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Descriptions of Spirituality among the American Public: The Relationship between Spiritual Salience and Specific Spiritual Understandings

David R. Hodge
Health & Social Work
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
article

Descriptions of Spirituality among the American Public: The Relationship between Spiritual Salience and Specific Spiritual Understandings

David R. Hodge
article en

Abstract

Social work's ethical and professional standards underscore the importance of engaging spirituality in practice settings, but relatively little research has appeared in the profession's literature equipping practitioners to address client spirituality. To alleviate this gap, this nationally representative study determined (a) the prevalence of 14 different understandings or descriptions of spirituality among American adults and (b) the relationship between the self-ascribed salience or importance of spirituality (and religion) and specific understandings of spirituality. The most widely endorsed description of what spirituality offered respondents was peace (65.9 percent) and the least widely endorsed was structure (23.5 percent). Self-reported importance of spirituality (but not religion) was positively associated with all 14 understandings of spirituality. The results suggest that practitioners should incorporate a measure of spiritual salience into their initial brief assessment. In situations where the results of the brief assessment suggest a more in-depth exploration of spirituality is indicated, the understandings of spirituality discussed in this study provide practitioners with a working template of specific perceptions that can be explored with clients and, potentially, leveraged to assist clients ameliorate the challenges they experience.

Health & Social WorkVol. 50(4)
University of Pennsylvania (US), Central Arizona College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.