Refining the Management of Prostate Imaging Reporting Category 3 Lesions through SelectMDx Urinary Biomarker Evaluation

Among patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions (n=40), a significant correlation between SelectMDx results and biopsy-confirmed clinically significant prostate cancer was observed. Clinically significant cancer was detected in 57.1% of patients with a positive SelectMDx result, compared to 18.2% in those with a negative result (p=0.031). The test demonstrated a sensitivity of 57.14%, a specificity of 81.82%, a positive predictive value of 40% and a negative predictive value of 90%, with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 77.5%. While age emerged as the only independent predictor in multivariate analysis, SelectMDx showed a strong potential to exclude malignancy and support more selective biopsy strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MAEDICA – a Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2025.20.2.176
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Refining the Management of Prostate Imaging Reporting Category 3 Lesions through SelectMDx Urinary Biomarker Evaluation

D. Badescu, Justin Aurelian, Ștefan Rașcu, Cristian Sima et al.
MAEDICA – a Journal of Clinical Medicine
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Refining the Management of Prostate Imaging Reporting Category 3 Lesions through SelectMDx Urinary Biomarker Evaluation

D. Badescu, Justin Aurelian, Ștefan Rașcu, Cristian Sima, Răzvan Petca, Viorel Jinga, Cristian Valentin Toma, Petrino-Cristian Călinoiu, Ovidiu-Cătălin Nechita, Diana Neculai
article en

Abstract

Among patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions (n=40), a significant correlation between SelectMDx results and biopsy-confirmed clinically significant prostate cancer was observed. Clinically significant cancer was detected in 57.1% of patients with a positive SelectMDx result, compared to 18.2% in those with a negative result (p=0.031). The test demonstrated a sensitivity of 57.14%, a specificity of 81.82%, a positive predictive value of 40% and a negative predictive value of 90%, with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 77.5%. While age emerged as the only independent predictor in multivariate analysis, SelectMDx showed a strong potential to exclude malignancy and support more selective biopsy strategies.

MAEDICA – a Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 20(2)
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO), Academia Oamenilor de Știință din România (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Refining the Management of Prostate Imaging Reporting Category 3 Lesions through SelectMDx Urinary Biomarker Evaluation — D. Badescu, Justin Aurelian, et al. · MAEDICA – a Journal of Clinical Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS