Functional Profile Differences Across Diagnostic Categories Using WHODAS 2.0 in Adults with Neurological, Musculoskeletal, and Chronic Pain Conditions

<b>Background</b>: Functional disability is a growing concern in aging populations with chronic health conditions, yet few studies have compared disability profiles across diagnostic categories using standardized tools. <b>Objectives</b>: This study aimed to characterize the functional profiles of adults with neurological, musculoskeletal, and chronic pain conditions using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) and to examine differences by age and sex. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 419 participants (median age = 73 years; 73% female) completed the 36-item WHODAS 2.0. Diagnoses were classified into three groups: neurological (<i>n</i> = 134), musculoskeletal (<i>n</i> = 230), and pain-related (<i>n</i> = 55). Domain-level scores were analyzed using non-parametric tests and Spearman correlations. <b>Results</b>: revealed that neurological conditions were associated with the highest disability levels, particularly in cognition, interpersonal relations, and participation. Musculoskeletal conditions showed greater impairments in mobility and self-care, while pain-related conditions demonstrated variable disability, especially in participation. Women reported higher disability scores in the neurologic group, with significant differences observed in the cognition domain among neurological cases (<i>p</i> = 0.048). Age was positively correlated with disability in self-care and mobility, especially in musculoskeletal conditions. <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings highlight the utility of WHODAS 2.0 in identifying domain-specific limitations across clinical populations. They support the need for individualized, diagnosis- and gender-sensitive rehabilitation strategies, and suggest that WHODAS 2.0 can inform targeted care planning and resource allocation in rehabilitation settings. Future research should incorporate longitudinal designs and explore contextual factors influencing functional outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10030312
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Functional Profile Differences Across Diagnostic Categories Using WHODAS 2.0 in Adults with Neurological, Musculoskeletal, and Chronic Pain Conditions

Juan Pablo González Appelgren, Asterio Andrade, Juan C. Moreno, Felipe Covarrubias‐Escudero et al.
1 citations
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
1.39
article

Functional Profile Differences Across Diagnostic Categories Using WHODAS 2.0 in Adults with Neurological, Musculoskeletal, and Chronic Pain Conditions

Juan Pablo González Appelgren, Asterio Andrade, Juan C. Moreno, Felipe Covarrubias‐Escudero, Carlos A. Cifuentes, Patricio Barría, Bessié Córdova Albayay
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Functional disability is a growing concern in aging populations with chronic health conditions, yet few studies have compared disability profiles across diagnostic categories using standardized tools. <b>Objectives</b>: This study aimed to characterize the functional profiles of adults with neurological, musculoskeletal, and chronic pain conditions using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) and to examine differences by age and sex. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 419 participants (median age = 73 years; 73% female) completed the 36-item WHODAS 2.0. Diagnoses were classified into three groups: neurological (<i>n</i> = 134), musculoskeletal (<i>n</i> = 230), and pain-related (<i>n</i> = 55). Domain-level scores were analyzed using non-parametric tests and Spearman correlations. <b>Results</b>: revealed that neurological conditions were associated with the highest disability levels, particularly in cognition, interpersonal relations, and participation. Musculoskeletal conditions showed greater impairments in mobility and self-care, while pain-related conditions demonstrated variable disability, especially in participation. Women reported higher disability scores in the neurologic group, with significant differences observed in the cognition domain among neurological cases (<i>p</i> = 0.048). Age was positively correlated with disability in self-care and mobility, especially in musculoskeletal conditions. <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings highlight the utility of WHODAS 2.0 in identifying domain-specific limitations across clinical populations. They support the need for individualized, diagnosis- and gender-sensitive rehabilitation strategies, and suggest that WHODAS 2.0 can inform targeted care planning and resource allocation in rehabilitation settings. Future research should incorporate longitudinal designs and explore contextual factors influencing functional outcomes.

Journal of Functional Morphology and KinesiologyVol. 10(3)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), University of the West of England (GB), Metropolitan University of Educational Sciences (CL), Production Development Corporation (CL), Centre for Automation and Robotics (ES), Bristol Robotics Laboratory (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.