Assessment of Hypertension in Hemodialysis Patients with the Concomitant Use of Peridialytic and Interdialytic Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements

<b>Background:</b> For patients on hemodialysis, routine blood pressure (BP) measurements taken shortly before or after dialysis provide inaccurate estimates of the BP load during the interdialytic period. In this study, we used peridialytic recordings in combination with interdialytic ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) aiming to provide a more precise assessment of hypertension in a sample of 70 stable hemodialysis patients. <b>Methods:</b> The evaluation of hypertension in the study cohort was performed using the following approaches: (i) routine predialysis and postdialysis BP measurements taken by the dialysis-unit staff were prospectively recorded over six consecutive dialysis sessions; (ii) ABPM was performed using the Microlife WatchBPO3 device (20 min intervals during an entire 44 h interdialytic period). The diagnostic thresholds of hypertension were ≥140/90 mmHg for predialysis, ≥130/80 mmHg for postdialysis and ≥130/80 mmHg for 44 h ambulatory BP, respectively. Patients receiving ≥1 antihypertensive medication also were classified as hypertensives. <b>Results:</b> The prevalence of hypertension was 88.6% by predialysis, 92.9% by postdialysis and 90.0% by ambulatory BP measurements. In all, 87.1% of patients were being treated for hypertension. When the combination of predialysis and 44 h ambulatory BP was evaluated, the prevalence of sustained normotension, white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension was 52.9%, 21.4%, 5.7% and 20.0%, respectively. A similar distribution of patients into these phenotypes was observed when postdialysis BP was used for the classification of the severity of hypertension (50.0%, 24.3%, 5.7% and 20.0% for sustained normotension, white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension, respectively). Interdialytic ABPM revealed that just one patient had abnormal BP solely during the daytime period. Conversely, isolated nocturnal hypertension was diagnosed in 27.1% of patients. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study shows that among patients on hemodialysis, peridialytic BP is an inaccurate proxy of interdialytic ambulatory BP. In approximately 30% of patients, there is discordance between routine peridialytic recordings and interdialytic ABPM for the diagnosis of hypertension. ABPM also facilitates the diagnosis of isolated nocturnal hypertension, which is another frequent BP phenotype in this high-risk patient population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Life
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/life15081290
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Hypertension in Hemodialysis Patients with the Concomitant Use of Peridialytic and Interdialytic Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements

Vassilios Liakopoulos, Konstantinos Leivaditis, Ioannis Kontogiorgos, Panagiotis I. Georgianos et al.
1 citations
Life
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
1.39
article

Assessment of Hypertension in Hemodialysis Patients with the Concomitant Use of Peridialytic and Interdialytic Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements

Vassilios Liakopoulos, Konstantinos Leivaditis, Ioannis Kontogiorgos, Panagiotis I. Georgianos, Elias V. Balaskas, Eleni Georgianou, Stefanos K. Roumeliotis, Vasileios Rafailidis, Kallistheni Leonidou, Christodoula Kourtidou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> For patients on hemodialysis, routine blood pressure (BP) measurements taken shortly before or after dialysis provide inaccurate estimates of the BP load during the interdialytic period. In this study, we used peridialytic recordings in combination with interdialytic ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) aiming to provide a more precise assessment of hypertension in a sample of 70 stable hemodialysis patients. <b>Methods:</b> The evaluation of hypertension in the study cohort was performed using the following approaches: (i) routine predialysis and postdialysis BP measurements taken by the dialysis-unit staff were prospectively recorded over six consecutive dialysis sessions; (ii) ABPM was performed using the Microlife WatchBPO3 device (20 min intervals during an entire 44 h interdialytic period). The diagnostic thresholds of hypertension were ≥140/90 mmHg for predialysis, ≥130/80 mmHg for postdialysis and ≥130/80 mmHg for 44 h ambulatory BP, respectively. Patients receiving ≥1 antihypertensive medication also were classified as hypertensives. <b>Results:</b> The prevalence of hypertension was 88.6% by predialysis, 92.9% by postdialysis and 90.0% by ambulatory BP measurements. In all, 87.1% of patients were being treated for hypertension. When the combination of predialysis and 44 h ambulatory BP was evaluated, the prevalence of sustained normotension, white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension was 52.9%, 21.4%, 5.7% and 20.0%, respectively. A similar distribution of patients into these phenotypes was observed when postdialysis BP was used for the classification of the severity of hypertension (50.0%, 24.3%, 5.7% and 20.0% for sustained normotension, white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension, respectively). Interdialytic ABPM revealed that just one patient had abnormal BP solely during the daytime period. Conversely, isolated nocturnal hypertension was diagnosed in 27.1% of patients. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study shows that among patients on hemodialysis, peridialytic BP is an inaccurate proxy of interdialytic ambulatory BP. In approximately 30% of patients, there is discordance between routine peridialytic recordings and interdialytic ABPM for the diagnosis of hypertension. ABPM also facilitates the diagnosis of isolated nocturnal hypertension, which is another frequent BP phenotype in this high-risk patient population.

LifeVol. 15(8)
AHEPA University Hospital (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.