Can Oral Fluids Replace Nasal Swabs in Swine Influenza A Virus (swIAV) PCR Diagnostics?

The diagnosis of swine influenza A virus (swIAV) has to involve laboratory detection, as the clinical signs are not pathognomonic. Nasal swabs (NSs) have been the preferred sample material for swIAV PCR diagnostics, but oral fluid (OF) is a convenient alternative material. In this study, NSs and OFs from 35 Polish swine herds were collected and tested with real-time RT-PCR in order to assess swIAV circulation patterns in Poland and improve protocols for efficient, non-invasive and cost-effective swIAV surveillance in pig farms. The study showed that the swIAV RNA was detected in 65.7% of the tested farms. In total, 21.2% of NS pools and 48.6% of OF samples were positive for swIAV. The Ct values in NS pools and OFs were similar (<i>p</i> > 0.05), but a significant reduction (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in swIAV prevalence in NSs was observed in nursery pigs from farms applying swIAV vaccinations. Successful subtyping was achieved more effectively with OFs compared to NSs, and the H1avN2 was most prevalent subtype detected. The results emphasized that OF can be useful for monitoring swIAV and subtyping. However, OFs cannot replace NSs, which were more useful in the assessment of the effect of swIAV vaccinations in nursery pigs.