Clinical and Imaging-Based Prognostic Models for Recurrence and Local Tumor Progression Following Thermal Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review

<b>Background:</b> Early detection of patients at high risk for recurrence or local tumor progression (LTP) following thermal ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is essential for treatment selection and individualized follow-up. This systematic review aims to assess and compare the performance of prognostic models predicting recurrence or LTP in patients with HCC treated with thermal ablation. <b>Methods:</b> PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for studies developing models to predict recurrence after thermal ablation in treatment-naïve HCC patients, using imaging and clinical data with reported test set performance. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed by the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Data on model performance, feature extraction and modeling technique was collected. <b>Results:</b> In total, 16 studies comprising 39 prognostic models were included, all developed using retrospective data from China or Korea. Outcomes included recurrence-free survival, (intrahepatic) early recurrence, LTP, late recurrence and aggressive intrasegmental recurrence. Predictive parameters varied across models addressing identical outcomes. Outcome definitions also differed. Nine models were externally validated. Most studies had a high risk of bias due to methodological limitations. <b>Conclusions:</b> Variability in model development methodology and type of predictors was found. Models that integrated multiple types of predictors consistently outperformed those relying on one type. To advance predictive tools toward clinical implementation, future research should prioritize standardized outcome definitions, external testing, and transparent reporting. Until these challenges are addressed, current evaluated models should be regarded as promising but preliminary tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17162656
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and Imaging-Based Prognostic Models for Recurrence and Local Tumor Progression Following Thermal Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review

Mark C. Burgmans, Jouke Dijkstra, Faeze Gholamiankhah, Ariadne L van der Velden et al.
1 links
Cancers
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Clinical and Imaging-Based Prognostic Models for Recurrence and Local Tumor Progression Following Thermal Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review

Mark C. Burgmans, Jouke Dijkstra, Faeze Gholamiankhah, Ariadne L van der Velden, Rodolfo Lanocita, Gonnie C. M. van Erp, Ralph Brecheisen, Christiaan van der Leij, Alexander Broersen, Coosje A. M. Verhagen, Hossein Rahmani, Emma C M Buijsman
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Early detection of patients at high risk for recurrence or local tumor progression (LTP) following thermal ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is essential for treatment selection and individualized follow-up. This systematic review aims to assess and compare the performance of prognostic models predicting recurrence or LTP in patients with HCC treated with thermal ablation. <b>Methods:</b> PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for studies developing models to predict recurrence after thermal ablation in treatment-naïve HCC patients, using imaging and clinical data with reported test set performance. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed by the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Data on model performance, feature extraction and modeling technique was collected. <b>Results:</b> In total, 16 studies comprising 39 prognostic models were included, all developed using retrospective data from China or Korea. Outcomes included recurrence-free survival, (intrahepatic) early recurrence, LTP, late recurrence and aggressive intrasegmental recurrence. Predictive parameters varied across models addressing identical outcomes. Outcome definitions also differed. Nine models were externally validated. Most studies had a high risk of bias due to methodological limitations. <b>Conclusions:</b> Variability in model development methodology and type of predictors was found. Models that integrated multiple types of predictors consistently outperformed those relying on one type. To advance predictive tools toward clinical implementation, future research should prioritize standardized outcome definitions, external testing, and transparent reporting. Until these challenges are addressed, current evaluated models should be regarded as promising but preliminary tools.

CancersVol. 17(16)
Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Tumori Foundation (US), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT), Maastro Clinic (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.