Participant Perspectives on Data Sharing in Clinical Craniofacial Research: Qualitative Interviews With Participants With Craniofacial Microsomia and Their Caregivers

ObjectiveTo describe the perspectives of participants and caregivers of pediatric participants on data sharing in clinical craniofacial research.DesignQualitative interview study of research participants' attitudes about data sharing.SettingOne-to-one interviews via web conferencing.Patients, ParticipantsAdults (n = 7) and adolescents (n = 8) with craniofacial microsomia and caregivers (n = 20) of children with craniofacial microsomia who previously participated in clinical craniofacial research.InterventionsSemistructured interview guide addressing 4 main topics: (1) expectations about data collection and sharing; (2) preferences and limitations for data sharing; (3) consent/assent language; and (4) gaps and future needs.Main Outcome Measure(s)We iteratively developed a qualitative codebook based on inductive interview transcript review and conducted a thematic analysis of coded data.ResultsWe identified 5 themes within participants' descriptions of their attitudes about data sharing: (1) participants hope that research participation and data sharing will advance science for the benefit of the craniofacial community; (2) sharing images is broadly recognized as important for craniofacial research but raises discomfort for some; (3) participants generally view broad data sharing and use positively but raise concerns focused on harm to the craniofacial community; (4) trustworthy researchers and data protections provide reassurance for sharing data; and (5) decisions about pediatric data sharing are complex in the context of developing autonomy.ConclusionsThese findings illustrate ethical complexities for data sharing in clinical craniofacial research related to balancing community-oriented benefits and risks, providing control over sharing images, ensuring researcher trustworthiness, and respecting a child's future autonomy interests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656251369658
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Participant Perspectives on Data Sharing in Clinical Craniofacial Research: Qualitative Interviews With Participants With Craniofacial Microsomia and Their Caregivers

Laura P. Stueckle, Stephanie A. Kraft, Carrie L. Heike, A. Beretta et al.
1 citations
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Ethics in Clinical Research
1.88
article

Participant Perspectives on Data Sharing in Clinical Craniofacial Research: Qualitative Interviews With Participants With Craniofacial Microsomia and Their Caregivers

Laura P. Stueckle, Stephanie A. Kraft, Carrie L. Heike, A. Beretta, Elsa Ayala
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ObjectiveTo describe the perspectives of participants and caregivers of pediatric participants on data sharing in clinical craniofacial research.DesignQualitative interview study of research participants' attitudes about data sharing.SettingOne-to-one interviews via web conferencing.Patients, ParticipantsAdults (n = 7) and adolescents (n = 8) with craniofacial microsomia and caregivers (n = 20) of children with craniofacial microsomia who previously participated in clinical craniofacial research.InterventionsSemistructured interview guide addressing 4 main topics: (1) expectations about data collection and sharing; (2) preferences and limitations for data sharing; (3) consent/assent language; and (4) gaps and future needs.Main Outcome Measure(s)We iteratively developed a qualitative codebook based on inductive interview transcript review and conducted a thematic analysis of coded data.ResultsWe identified 5 themes within participants' descriptions of their attitudes about data sharing: (1) participants hope that research participation and data sharing will advance science for the benefit of the craniofacial community; (2) sharing images is broadly recognized as important for craniofacial research but raises discomfort for some; (3) participants generally view broad data sharing and use positively but raise concerns focused on harm to the craniofacial community; (4) trustworthy researchers and data protections provide reassurance for sharing data; and (5) decisions about pediatric data sharing are complex in the context of developing autonomy.ConclusionsThese findings illustrate ethical complexities for data sharing in clinical craniofacial research related to balancing community-oriented benefits and risks, providing control over sharing images, ensuring researcher trustworthiness, and respecting a child's future autonomy interests.

The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Seattle Children's Hospital (US), University of Washington (US), Decision Sciences (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ethics in Clinical Research
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.