A realist perspective on optimizing community health workers’ roles and functions to deliver integrated people-centred care

Community Health Workers (CHWs) play a crucial role to support health care delivery in underserved communities. Although the value of CHWs' contributions is widely recognised, there is limited evidence on the mechanisms that enable CHWs to deliver people-centred care. Using a realist evaluation approach guided by WHO's Integrated People-Centred Health Services (IPCHS) framework, the study focused on how different contexts and mechanisms interact to align with the IPCHS strategies to shape CHWs' capacity to deliver people-centred care. This realist qualitative study was conducted in five rural communities in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Data was collected through structured observations of CHWs' interactions with households; interviews with CHWs, service users, household decision makers, outreach team leaders (CHWs' supervisors), and clinic operational managers. Data was further corroborated through three focus group discussions with CHWs. Using thematic analysis and realist evaluation methods, we identified Context-Mechanism-Outcome (CMO) configurations influencing CHWs' delivery of people-centred care, followed by refinement of the programme theory and development of middle-range theories. The study identified meta-mechanisms (trust, legitimacy, and motivation) that operate across all domains of the IPCHS framework and underpin the ability of CHWs to engage communities, coordinate care, and deliver integrated, people-centred services. These meta-mechanisms are triggered within enabling conditions, notably formalized supervision, CHW integration into the formal health system, and intersectoral collaboration. However, governance gaps such as precarious employment, inadequate remuneration, poor resourcing, lack of data feedback loops, and insufficient institutional recognition of CHWs' intersectoral role undermines these interactions, resulting in the poor delivery of IPCHS. The study contributes to policy discussions by providing middle-range theories that explain how, why, and when CHW-led people-centred interventions fail or succeed. Critical findings include the need for a dynamic Integrated, Mechanism-Sensitive Model of the IPCHS and governance reforms that include structured workforce integration for adequate resourcing and intersectoral action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004926
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A realist perspective on optimizing community health workers’ roles and functions to deliver integrated people-centred care

Mosa Moshabela, Sanah Bucibo, Zamasomi Luvuno, Tasneem Kathree et al.
2 citations
PLOS Global Public Health
Global Maternal and Child Health
6.99
article

A realist perspective on optimizing community health workers’ roles and functions to deliver integrated people-centred care

Mosa Moshabela, Sanah Bucibo, Zamasomi Luvuno, Tasneem Kathree, Inge Petersen, André Janse van Rensburg, Usangiphile E Buthelezi, Arvin Bhana, Noxolisa Radebe
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Community Health Workers (CHWs) play a crucial role to support health care delivery in underserved communities. Although the value of CHWs' contributions is widely recognised, there is limited evidence on the mechanisms that enable CHWs to deliver people-centred care. Using a realist evaluation approach guided by WHO's Integrated People-Centred Health Services (IPCHS) framework, the study focused on how different contexts and mechanisms interact to align with the IPCHS strategies to shape CHWs' capacity to deliver people-centred care. This realist qualitative study was conducted in five rural communities in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Data was collected through structured observations of CHWs' interactions with households; interviews with CHWs, service users, household decision makers, outreach team leaders (CHWs' supervisors), and clinic operational managers. Data was further corroborated through three focus group discussions with CHWs. Using thematic analysis and realist evaluation methods, we identified Context-Mechanism-Outcome (CMO) configurations influencing CHWs' delivery of people-centred care, followed by refinement of the programme theory and development of middle-range theories. The study identified meta-mechanisms (trust, legitimacy, and motivation) that operate across all domains of the IPCHS framework and underpin the ability of CHWs to engage communities, coordinate care, and deliver integrated, people-centred services. These meta-mechanisms are triggered within enabling conditions, notably formalized supervision, CHW integration into the formal health system, and intersectoral collaboration. However, governance gaps such as precarious employment, inadequate remuneration, poor resourcing, lack of data feedback loops, and insufficient institutional recognition of CHWs' intersectoral role undermines these interactions, resulting in the poor delivery of IPCHS. The study contributes to policy discussions by providing middle-range theories that explain how, why, and when CHW-led people-centred interventions fail or succeed. Critical findings include the need for a dynamic Integrated, Mechanism-Sensitive Model of the IPCHS and governance reforms that include structured workforce integration for adequate resourcing and intersectoral action.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 5(9)
South African Medical Research Council (ZA), University of Cape Town (ZA), Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (ZA), Health Systems Trust (ZA), Africa Health Research Institute (ZA), University College London (GB), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Wellcome Trust, South African Medical Research Council, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Medical Research Council, Division of Research Capacity Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Global Maternal and Child Health
6.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.