Hybrid Reasoning AI System for Nursing Ethics Education: Development and Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness of NurseEthAI in enhancing the ethical decision-making ability of nursing students and compare it with traditional case-based teaching methods. Methods: Using a randomized controlled trial design, 80 third year nursing students from a certain university were included and randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group. Evaluate based on the nursing ethics decision-making power scale, and compare the intervention effect through pre-test and post test analysis. Results: The total score of ethical decision-making in the experimental group significantly increased from <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$310.49 \pm$</tex> 25.33 points to <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$355.73 \pm 24.57$</tex> points (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathrm{t}=8.37, \mathrm{p}&lt;0.001$</tex>), while the control group increased from <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$306.74 \pm 26.18$</tex> points to <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$324.39 \pm 25.62$</tex> points (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathrm{t}=3.45, \mathrm{p}=0.001$</tex>). The improvement in ethical action dimension is particularly significant (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{p}&lt;\mathbf{0. 0 0 1}$</tex>). The distribution of ability levels shows that the proportion of high-level decision-makers in the experimental group increased from 30.00 % to 80.00 %, while the control group only increased from 27.50 % to 45.00 %. Conclusion: The NurseEthAI system can significantly enhance the ethical decision-making ability of nursing students, especially in the dimension of ethical action, providing an efficient tool for clinical nursing education. In the future, it is necessary to combine clinical practice to further optimize system functions and promote the transformation from “ethical cognition” to “ethical behavior”.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccste65902.2025.11138042
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid Reasoning AI System for Nursing Ethics Education: Development and Randomized Controlled Trial

Wei Meng, Xiaoxi Liu, Chyong Li
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Hybrid Reasoning AI System for Nursing Ethics Education: Development and Randomized Controlled Trial

Wei Meng, Xiaoxi Liu, Chyong Li
article en

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness of NurseEthAI in enhancing the ethical decision-making ability of nursing students and compare it with traditional case-based teaching methods. Methods: Using a randomized controlled trial design, 80 third year nursing students from a certain university were included and randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group. Evaluate based on the nursing ethics decision-making power scale, and compare the intervention effect through pre-test and post test analysis. Results: The total score of ethical decision-making in the experimental group significantly increased from <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$310.49 \pm$</tex> 25.33 points to <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$355.73 \pm 24.57$</tex> points (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathrm{t}=8.37, \mathrm{p}&lt;0.001$</tex>), while the control group increased from <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$306.74 \pm 26.18$</tex> points to <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$324.39 \pm 25.62$</tex> points (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathrm{t}=3.45, \mathrm{p}=0.001$</tex>). The improvement in ethical action dimension is particularly significant (<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\mathbf{p}&lt;\mathbf{0. 0 0 1}$</tex>). The distribution of ability levels shows that the proportion of high-level decision-makers in the experimental group increased from 30.00 % to 80.00 %, while the control group only increased from 27.50 % to 45.00 %. Conclusion: The NurseEthAI system can significantly enhance the ethical decision-making ability of nursing students, especially in the dimension of ethical action, providing an efficient tool for clinical nursing education. In the future, it is necessary to combine clinical practice to further optimize system functions and promote the transformation from “ethical cognition” to “ethical behavior”.

Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hybrid Reasoning AI System for Nursing Ethics Education: Development and Randomized Controlled Trial — Wei Meng, Xiaoxi Liu, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS