Analysis Of The Quality Improvement Management Process Through PDSA At Puskesmas Sidoarjo Sidoarjo District

Improving the quality of health center is very important to realize quality and equitable health services. This study aims to analyze the implementation of continuous quality management through the PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Action) cycle at Sidoarjo Health Center. The method used is descriptive comparative to compare Deming's PDSA theory with its implementation based on the Sidoarjo Health Center Quality Improvement Report Year 2024. The results showed that there were shortcomings in the preparation of details at the Plan step, such as the non-use of root cause analysis tools (fishbone or 5 whys), and the absence of success criteria. At the Do and Study steps, assessment of plan implementation and evaluation of plan effectiveness was not optimal. The Action step has also not been implemented in detail, and the follow-up plan has not described the evaluation results of the Study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Technology and Public Health Journal
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33086/mtphj.v9i2.6792
Primary Topic
Healthcare Quality and Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis Of The Quality Improvement Management Process Through PDSA At Puskesmas Sidoarjo Sidoarjo District

Frysca Virnanda Retikasari, Danang Abd Ghani, Apriliana Lailatul Maghfiroh, Firmanni Finishia
Medical Technology and Public Health Journal
Healthcare Quality and Satisfaction
article

Analysis Of The Quality Improvement Management Process Through PDSA At Puskesmas Sidoarjo Sidoarjo District

Frysca Virnanda Retikasari, Danang Abd Ghani, Apriliana Lailatul Maghfiroh, Firmanni Finishia
article en

Abstract

Improving the quality of health center is very important to realize quality and equitable health services. This study aims to analyze the implementation of continuous quality management through the PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Action) cycle at Sidoarjo Health Center. The method used is descriptive comparative to compare Deming's PDSA theory with its implementation based on the Sidoarjo Health Center Quality Improvement Report Year 2024. The results showed that there were shortcomings in the preparation of details at the Plan step, such as the non-use of root cause analysis tools (fishbone or 5 whys), and the absence of success criteria. At the Do and Study steps, assessment of plan implementation and evaluation of plan effectiveness was not optimal. The Action step has also not been implemented in detail, and the follow-up plan has not described the evaluation results of the Study.

Medical Technology and Public Health JournalVol. 9(2)
Universitas Airlangga (ID), Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia (ID), Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Healthcare Quality and Satisfaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analysis Of The Quality Improvement Management Process Through PDSA At Puskesmas Sidoarjo Sidoarjo District — Frysca Virnanda Retikasari, Danang Abd Ghani, et al. · Medical Technology and Public Health Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS