Who’s Not Talking? Nonresponse Bias in Healthcare Employee Well-Being Surveys

Results demonstrate that individuals at higher risk within an organization, as indicated by higher turnover risk and lower productivity, are less likely to fill out employee surveys. This suggests that employee survey results are skewed by nonresponse bias with respect to outcomes of interest, and that relying solely on survey data may lead to incorrect conclusions about workforce functioning, and subsequently, interventions that do not meet the needs of those most at risk within the organization. In addition to the valuable qualitative insights that surveys provide, healthcare leaders should leverage alternative data-collection methods, such as EHRs and HRIS data, to augment survey data and find out how nonrespondents differ from respondents. In this way, they can gain a comprehensive understanding of employee functioning to inform procedural and policy changes to enhance employee well-being and decrease negative outcomes, such as turnover and low productivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Healthcare Management
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/jhm-d-24-00166
Primary Topic
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who’s Not Talking? Nonresponse Bias in Healthcare Employee Well-Being Surveys

Rajeev Agrawal, Elizabeth Cherot, Bart Blackburn, Xi Hu et al.
Journal of Healthcare Management
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
article

Who’s Not Talking? Nonresponse Bias in Healthcare Employee Well-Being Surveys

Rajeev Agrawal, Elizabeth Cherot, Bart Blackburn, Xi Hu, Richard B. Freeman, Tiffany Chan, C. Aubrey Rhodes, Thomas S. Dardarian, Stephanie Rouse
article en

Abstract

Results demonstrate that individuals at higher risk within an organization, as indicated by higher turnover risk and lower productivity, are less likely to fill out employee surveys. This suggests that employee survey results are skewed by nonresponse bias with respect to outcomes of interest, and that relying solely on survey data may lead to incorrect conclusions about workforce functioning, and subsequently, interventions that do not meet the needs of those most at risk within the organization. In addition to the valuable qualitative insights that surveys provide, healthcare leaders should leverage alternative data-collection methods, such as EHRs and HRIS data, to augment survey data and find out how nonrespondents differ from respondents. In this way, they can gain a comprehensive understanding of employee functioning to inform procedural and policy changes to enhance employee well-being and decrease negative outcomes, such as turnover and low productivity.

Journal of Healthcare ManagementVol. 70(5)
National Bureau of Economic Research (US), College of San Mateo (US), King's College London (GB), Virtua Voorhees Hospital (US), Philadelphia Fire Department (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who’s Not Talking? Nonresponse Bias in Healthcare Employee Well-Being Surveys — Rajeev Agrawal, Elizabeth Cherot, et al. · Journal of Healthcare Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS