Assessing ChatGPT Ability to Answer Common Patient Questions on Distal Biceps Ruptures

Background ChatGPT (OpenAI) is an artificial intelligence (AI) driven software that responds conversationally to written prompts. Given the rapid growth of ChatGPT and its accessibility, it is likely that patients may use this technology for medical education. The aim of this study was to determine if ChatGPT could appropriately respond to frequently asked questions (FAQ) pertaining to distal biceps rupture. Methods Ten questions were gathered from the ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ section of ten well-known health care institutions. The questions were then entered into ChatGPT 3.5 with no follow-up prompts. The responses were analyzed for accuracy, completeness, and readability using DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria, and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores. Results The average Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level of the ten responses was 14.9 (range: 11.87-17.44). Using the DISCERN score, one response was rated as “Very Poor,” seven responses were rated as “Poor,” and two responses were rated as “Fair.” The JAMA Benchmark criteria was zero for all responses. Conclusion The chatbot was able to answer commonly asked questions by patients pertaining to distal biceps rupture sufficiently, responses in a coherent manner that most patients would be able to understand. However, the high reading level may not be suitable for most patients, and the lack of documentation of the sources of information prevents readers from checking the factual content of the responses. For a comprehensive discussion of the treatment options and their implications, it remains essential for patients to have a consultation with a board-certified orthopedic surgeon with the appropriate training to address this injury.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.137257
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing ChatGPT Ability to Answer Common Patient Questions on Distal Biceps Ruptures

Payton Yerke Hansen, CharlesA. Parker, Katelyn Kane, Samantha L. Reiss et al.
Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
article

Assessing ChatGPT Ability to Answer Common Patient Questions on Distal Biceps Ruptures

Payton Yerke Hansen, CharlesA. Parker, Katelyn Kane, Samantha L. Reiss, Jared Kushner, Anton Pelto, William Pallisary
article en

Abstract

Background ChatGPT (OpenAI) is an artificial intelligence (AI) driven software that responds conversationally to written prompts. Given the rapid growth of ChatGPT and its accessibility, it is likely that patients may use this technology for medical education. The aim of this study was to determine if ChatGPT could appropriately respond to frequently asked questions (FAQ) pertaining to distal biceps rupture. Methods Ten questions were gathered from the ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ section of ten well-known health care institutions. The questions were then entered into ChatGPT 3.5 with no follow-up prompts. The responses were analyzed for accuracy, completeness, and readability using DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria, and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores. Results The average Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level of the ten responses was 14.9 (range: 11.87-17.44). Using the DISCERN score, one response was rated as “Very Poor,” seven responses were rated as “Poor,” and two responses were rated as “Fair.” The JAMA Benchmark criteria was zero for all responses. Conclusion The chatbot was able to answer commonly asked questions by patients pertaining to distal biceps rupture sufficiently, responses in a coherent manner that most patients would be able to understand. However, the high reading level may not be suitable for most patients, and the lack of documentation of the sources of information prevents readers from checking the factual content of the responses. For a comprehensive discussion of the treatment options and their implications, it remains essential for patients to have a consultation with a board-certified orthopedic surgeon with the appropriate training to address this injury.

Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & InnovationVol. 6(2)
Hackensack University Medical Center (US), SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US), Louisiana State University in Shreveport (US), Florida Atlantic University (US), Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.