High nitrogen retention potential of cellulose and starch applied to four soils under simulated post-harvest conditions

• Labile high-carbon soil amendments (HCA) can improve post-harvest N retention in four soils. • Starch stimulates N immobilization faster but for a shorter period of time than cellulose. • Microbial-mediated retention of N min is regulated by soil pH and soil organic carbon (SOC). • HCA promote the formation of amino acids as important sinks for excess post-harvest N min . Conventional agriculture often leaves surplus mineral nitrogen (N min ) after harvest, increasing the risk of nitrogen (N) loss. Applying high soil carbon amendments (HCA) can promote microbial N retention when catch crops are not feasible. However, the effects of soil type on microbial N immobilization in response to HCA application are insufficiently understood. Here, we applied 50 kg N ha −1 as 15 N-labelled (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 and 4 t C ha −1 as starch or cellulose to the Ap horizon of four contrasting agricultural soils in different soil organic carbon (SOC) and texture: alkaline silty Luvisol (SOC 0.93 %) and Regosol (SOC 0.35 %), and acidic sandy Luvisol (SOC 0.58 %) and Gleysol (SOC 1.72 %). Soils were incubated for 98 days at 8.6 °C and 65 % water-holding capacity, simulating post-harvest conditions in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. After 98 days under post-harvest condition, cellulose application reduced N min by 50–140 kg N ha −1 depending on the soil type, while starch induced faster N min retention, followed by gradual re-release of N min towards the end of the incubation period. HCA-amended soil showed that most of the 15 N was recovered in the soil N pool inaccessible to multiple extractions (N ret ), rather than in microbial biomass. In HCA-amended clay soils, the recovery of 15 N in N ret was approximately twice that of the Control. In sandy acidic soils, HCA increased the recovery of 15 N in N ret to levels comparable to those in alkaline soils, while in SOC-rich sandy loam soils, only cellulose caused a slight increase in N ret . After incubation, up to 41 % of labeled N min was stabilized in the form of amino acids, with a more pronounced effect when HCA was added. We conclude that labile organic C can promote the conversion of excess N min into more stable N forms, such as amino acids or peptides, that are able to stabilize N beyond the post-harvest period.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoderma
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117500
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High nitrogen retention potential of cellulose and starch applied to four soils under simulated post-harvest conditions

Kerui Zhao, Nicolas Brüggemann, Rüdiger Reichel, Lu Xiao et al.
Geoderma
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

High nitrogen retention potential of cellulose and starch applied to four soils under simulated post-harvest conditions

Kerui Zhao, Nicolas Brüggemann, Rüdiger Reichel, Lu Xiao, Holger Wissel
article en

Abstract

• Labile high-carbon soil amendments (HCA) can improve post-harvest N retention in four soils. • Starch stimulates N immobilization faster but for a shorter period of time than cellulose. • Microbial-mediated retention of N min is regulated by soil pH and soil organic carbon (SOC). • HCA promote the formation of amino acids as important sinks for excess post-harvest N min . Conventional agriculture often leaves surplus mineral nitrogen (N min ) after harvest, increasing the risk of nitrogen (N) loss. Applying high soil carbon amendments (HCA) can promote microbial N retention when catch crops are not feasible. However, the effects of soil type on microbial N immobilization in response to HCA application are insufficiently understood. Here, we applied 50 kg N ha −1 as 15 N-labelled (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 and 4 t C ha −1 as starch or cellulose to the Ap horizon of four contrasting agricultural soils in different soil organic carbon (SOC) and texture: alkaline silty Luvisol (SOC 0.93 %) and Regosol (SOC 0.35 %), and acidic sandy Luvisol (SOC 0.58 %) and Gleysol (SOC 1.72 %). Soils were incubated for 98 days at 8.6 °C and 65 % water-holding capacity, simulating post-harvest conditions in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. After 98 days under post-harvest condition, cellulose application reduced N min by 50–140 kg N ha −1 depending on the soil type, while starch induced faster N min retention, followed by gradual re-release of N min towards the end of the incubation period. HCA-amended soil showed that most of the 15 N was recovered in the soil N pool inaccessible to multiple extractions (N ret ), rather than in microbial biomass. In HCA-amended clay soils, the recovery of 15 N in N ret was approximately twice that of the Control. In sandy acidic soils, HCA increased the recovery of 15 N in N ret to levels comparable to those in alkaline soils, while in SOC-rich sandy loam soils, only cellulose caused a slight increase in N ret . After incubation, up to 41 % of labeled N min was stabilized in the form of amino acids, with a more pronounced effect when HCA was added. We conclude that labile organic C can promote the conversion of excess N min into more stable N forms, such as amino acids or peptides, that are able to stabilize N beyond the post-harvest period.

GeodermaVol. 461
University of Bonn (DE), Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, China Scholarship Council, BonaRes
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.