From space to place: A Visual Grounded Theory analysis of how college students shape study environments

Study environments shape students’ academic engagement and self-regulation, yet informal, self-selected spaces remain underexplored. This exploratory study used Visual Grounded Theory (VGT) to analyze 1418 photographs submitted by 446 undergraduate students at a large Midwestern university in the United States. Guided by Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT), we employed iterative coding, researcher reflexivity, and delayed theoretical integration to inductively identify key physical, technological, and psychosocial features of students’ study environments. We then drew on symbolic interactionism and affordance theory to interpret how students personalized, regulated, and adapted their study spaces over time. Findings identify six emergent themes: (1) stability and constraints in designated study areas, (2) environmental regulation strategies, (3) technological affordances, (4) personalization as an emotional anchor, (5) adaptability in alternative spaces, and (6) temporal adaptation across the semester. Methodologically, we introduce comparative captioning as an original interpretive strategy for synthesizing visual and contextual data within a grounded theory framework. These insights extend research on situated cognition and self-regulated learning by illustrating how material features and symbolic meaning-making jointly shape academic behavior. Practical implications are offered for educators, space designers, and students seeking to optimize study environments through greater flexibility, personalization, and functional alignment with academic demands.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Learning in Context
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lecon.2025.100016
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From space to place: A Visual Grounded Theory analysis of how college students shape study environments

Kui Xie, Mike Frazier, Garam Lee, Qiyang Lin
1 citations
Learning in Context
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
8.93
article

From space to place: A Visual Grounded Theory analysis of how college students shape study environments

Kui Xie, Mike Frazier, Garam Lee, Qiyang Lin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Study environments shape students’ academic engagement and self-regulation, yet informal, self-selected spaces remain underexplored. This exploratory study used Visual Grounded Theory (VGT) to analyze 1418 photographs submitted by 446 undergraduate students at a large Midwestern university in the United States. Guided by Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT), we employed iterative coding, researcher reflexivity, and delayed theoretical integration to inductively identify key physical, technological, and psychosocial features of students’ study environments. We then drew on symbolic interactionism and affordance theory to interpret how students personalized, regulated, and adapted their study spaces over time. Findings identify six emergent themes: (1) stability and constraints in designated study areas, (2) environmental regulation strategies, (3) technological affordances, (4) personalization as an emotional anchor, (5) adaptability in alternative spaces, and (6) temporal adaptation across the semester. Methodologically, we introduce comparative captioning as an original interpretive strategy for synthesizing visual and contextual data within a grounded theory framework. These insights extend research on situated cognition and self-regulated learning by illustrating how material features and symbolic meaning-making jointly shape academic behavior. Practical implications are offered for educators, space designers, and students seeking to optimize study environments through greater flexibility, personalization, and functional alignment with academic demands.

Learning in ContextVol. 2(1-2)
Spencer Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.