Current status of the use of validated home blood pressure monitoring devices among Korean patients with hypertension

The implementation of Home Blood Pressure Monitoring (HBPM) has improved the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. Current clinical guidelines advocate the use of validated HBPM devices. However, few studies have examined the current use of validated HBPM devices. We aimed to investigate the current status of the use of validated HBPM devices in real-world hypertensive patients. This study was conducted on Korean patients with hypertension using CareforMe®, a smartphone healthcare application which allows the patients to record their HBPM data which can be shared with their physicians. The validation status of HBPM devices was identified based on four registries: STRIDE BP, Medaval, the Japanese Society of Hypertension, and dabl® Educational Trust. From January 2022 through August 2024, 2731 patients entered the model numbers of their HBPM devices. 56.4% (n = 1539) of the population were male, and the mean age was 53.5 ± 10.8 years old. 110 models from 33 different manufacturers were identified. 97.0% (n = 2649) of the patients used upper-arm devices and 3.0% (n = 82) used wrist devices. Based on the four registries, 32.7% (n = 36) out of 110 devices were validated, and 51.5% (n = 1407) out of 2731 patients used validated devices. Patients using validated devices tend to use more expensive devices than those using non-validated devices (P < 0.0001). Among Korean patients with hypertension undergoing HBPM, 97.0% of the patients used upper-arm devices and 51.5% of the patients used validated devices. Our results proposed the urgent need for patient education and public accessibility to validated devices for the better management of patients with hypertension. The validation status of HBPM devices was identified based on four registries: STRIDE BP, Medaval, the JSH, and dabl® Educational Trust. 51.5% (n = 1,407) out of 2,731 patients used validated devices and 32.7% (n = 36) out of 110 devices were validated. Patient education and public accessibility on validated devices are urgently needed. HBPM home blood pressure monitoring; JSH Japanese Society of Hypertension.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hypertension Research
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-025-02364-z
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current status of the use of validated home blood pressure monitoring devices among Korean patients with hypertension

Jin Oh Na, Eun Mi Lee, Dae-Young Kim, Ki Ho Park et al.
Hypertension Research
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

Current status of the use of validated home blood pressure monitoring devices among Korean patients with hypertension

Jin Oh Na, Eun Mi Lee, Dae-Young Kim, Ki Ho Park, Sung‐Hee Shin, Jinho Shin, Yu Mi Kim, Ji-Eun Lee, Seung-Won Yoo
article en

Abstract

The implementation of Home Blood Pressure Monitoring (HBPM) has improved the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. Current clinical guidelines advocate the use of validated HBPM devices. However, few studies have examined the current use of validated HBPM devices. We aimed to investigate the current status of the use of validated HBPM devices in real-world hypertensive patients. This study was conducted on Korean patients with hypertension using CareforMe®, a smartphone healthcare application which allows the patients to record their HBPM data which can be shared with their physicians. The validation status of HBPM devices was identified based on four registries: STRIDE BP, Medaval, the Japanese Society of Hypertension, and dabl® Educational Trust. From January 2022 through August 2024, 2731 patients entered the model numbers of their HBPM devices. 56.4% (n = 1539) of the population were male, and the mean age was 53.5 ± 10.8 years old. 110 models from 33 different manufacturers were identified. 97.0% (n = 2649) of the patients used upper-arm devices and 3.0% (n = 82) used wrist devices. Based on the four registries, 32.7% (n = 36) out of 110 devices were validated, and 51.5% (n = 1407) out of 2731 patients used validated devices. Patients using validated devices tend to use more expensive devices than those using non-validated devices (P < 0.0001). Among Korean patients with hypertension undergoing HBPM, 97.0% of the patients used upper-arm devices and 51.5% of the patients used validated devices. Our results proposed the urgent need for patient education and public accessibility to validated devices for the better management of patients with hypertension. The validation status of HBPM devices was identified based on four registries: STRIDE BP, Medaval, the JSH, and dabl® Educational Trust. 51.5% (n = 1,407) out of 2,731 patients used validated devices and 32.7% (n = 36) out of 110 devices were validated. Patient education and public accessibility on validated devices are urgently needed. HBPM home blood pressure monitoring; JSH Japanese Society of Hypertension.

Hypertension ResearchVol. 48(11)
Korea University Medical Center (KR), NCSOFT (South Korea) (KR), Inha University Hospital (KR), Hanyang University (KR), Wonkwang University (KR)
Wonkwang University, Korea Health Industry Development Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.