Mammographic density assessed using deep learning in women at high risk of developing breast cancer: the effect of weight change on density

<i>Purpose:</i>High mammographic density (MD) and excess weight are both associated with increased risk of breast cancer. Classically defined percentage density measures tend to increase with reduced weight due to disproportionate loss of breast fat, however the effect of weight loss on artificial intelligence-based density scores is unknown. We investigated an artificial intelligence-based density method, reporting density changes in 46 women enrolled in a weight-loss study in a family history breast cancer clinic, using a volumetric density method as a comparison.<i>Methods:</i>We analysed data from women who had weight recorded and mammograms taken at the start and end of the 12-month weight intervention study. MD was assessed at both time points using a deep learning model trained on expert estimates of percent density called pVAS, and the volumetric density software Volpara<sup>TM</sup>.<i>Results:</i>Mean (standard deviation) weight of participants at the start and end of the study was 86.0 (12.2) and 82.5 (13.8) respectively; mean (standard deviation) pVAS scores were 35.8 (13.0) and 36.3 (12.4), and Volpara volumetric percent density scores were 7.05 (4.4) and 7.6 (4.4).The Spearman rank correlation between reduction in weight and change in density was 0.17 (-0.13 to 0.43, p = 0.27) for pVAS and 0.59 (0.36 to 0.75, p<0.001) for Volpara volumetric percent density.<i>Conclusion:</i>pVAS percentage density measurements were not significantly affected by change in weight. Percent density measured with Volpara increased as weight decreased, driven by changes in fat volume.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ae029b
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mammographic density assessed using deep learning in women at high risk of developing breast cancer: the effect of weight change on density

Anthony Howell, Michelle Harvie, Steven Squires, D. Gareth Evans et al.
1 citations
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
1.52
article

Mammographic density assessed using deep learning in women at high risk of developing breast cancer: the effect of weight change on density

Anthony Howell, Michelle Harvie, Steven Squires, D. Gareth Evans, Susan Astley
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Purpose:</i>High mammographic density (MD) and excess weight are both associated with increased risk of breast cancer. Classically defined percentage density measures tend to increase with reduced weight due to disproportionate loss of breast fat, however the effect of weight loss on artificial intelligence-based density scores is unknown. We investigated an artificial intelligence-based density method, reporting density changes in 46 women enrolled in a weight-loss study in a family history breast cancer clinic, using a volumetric density method as a comparison.<i>Methods:</i>We analysed data from women who had weight recorded and mammograms taken at the start and end of the 12-month weight intervention study. MD was assessed at both time points using a deep learning model trained on expert estimates of percent density called pVAS, and the volumetric density software Volpara<sup>TM</sup>.<i>Results:</i>Mean (standard deviation) weight of participants at the start and end of the study was 86.0 (12.2) and 82.5 (13.8) respectively; mean (standard deviation) pVAS scores were 35.8 (13.0) and 36.3 (12.4), and Volpara volumetric percent density scores were 7.05 (4.4) and 7.6 (4.4).The Spearman rank correlation between reduction in weight and change in density was 0.17 (-0.13 to 0.43, p = 0.27) for pVAS and 0.59 (0.36 to 0.75, p<0.001) for Volpara volumetric percent density.<i>Conclusion:</i>pVAS percentage density measurements were not significantly affected by change in weight. Percent density measured with Volpara increased as weight decreased, driven by changes in fat volume.

Biomedical Physics & Engineering ExpressVol. 11(5)
University of Exeter (GB), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), University of Manchester (GB), St Mary's Hospital (GB), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute (GB), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Genomics (United Kingdom) (GB), NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.