Colorectal mucosal exposure area assessment using artificial intelligence: a multicenter prospective observational study

This study proposed a new quality control indicator for colonoscopy, the cumulative colorectal mucosal exposure area (CCMEA), to assess mucosal exposure, constructed a CCMEA system based on deep learning, and validated the indicator in a multicenter prospective observational study.The CCMEA system was based on ResNet50 and UNet++. A CCMEA threshold was determined on the basis of an adenoma detection rate (ADR) of 25%. A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted to evaluate the system and the threshold in clinical practice. Based on the CCMEA threshold, patients were divided into qualified and unqualified colonoscopy groups. The ADR and other lesion detection rates were then compared between the two groups.510 participants who underwent colonoscopy were evaluated, being grouped as having qualified (n = 270) or unqualified (n = 240) colonoscopies based on a CCMEA qualification threshold of 2000. The ADR was 39.5 percentage points higher in the qualified group than in the unqualified group (53.7% vs. 14.2%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 8.0, 95%CI 5.0-12.8; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and notably was higher for lesions ≤5 mm (42.2% vs. 10.0%; aOR 6.9, 95%CI 4.1-11.5; <i>P</i> < 0.001). The qualified group also had a significantly higher polyp detection rate (89.6% vs. 40.0%; aOR 13.1, 95%CI 7.8-21.8; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and higher mean numbers of both adenomas (1.0 vs. 0.2; adjusted incident rate ratio [aIRR] 5.9, 95%CI 4.3-8.4; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and polyps (5.8 vs. 1.3; aIRR 4.0, 95%CI 3.5-4.5; <i>P</i> < 0.001).The CCMEA qualified group, based on a CCMEA threshold of 2000, showed a higher ADR than the unqualified group, indicating CCMEA could be a promising colonoscopy quality indicator.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2695-1832
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Colorectal mucosal exposure area assessment using artificial intelligence: a multicenter prospective observational study

Dexin Gong, Liwen Yao, Lianlian Wu, Chaijie Luo et al.
Endoscopy
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Colorectal mucosal exposure area assessment using artificial intelligence: a multicenter prospective observational study

Dexin Gong, Liwen Yao, Lianlian Wu, Chaijie Luo, Jianping Fan, Wei Zhou, Ningning Wang, Muqiu Li, Sean Tan, Li Huang, Ying Li, Xueying Wang, Jialing Li, Honggang Yu, Jing Wang, Xiaoquan Zeng, Yirong Xu, H. Gao
article en

Abstract

This study proposed a new quality control indicator for colonoscopy, the cumulative colorectal mucosal exposure area (CCMEA), to assess mucosal exposure, constructed a CCMEA system based on deep learning, and validated the indicator in a multicenter prospective observational study.The CCMEA system was based on ResNet50 and UNet++. A CCMEA threshold was determined on the basis of an adenoma detection rate (ADR) of 25%. A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted to evaluate the system and the threshold in clinical practice. Based on the CCMEA threshold, patients were divided into qualified and unqualified colonoscopy groups. The ADR and other lesion detection rates were then compared between the two groups.510 participants who underwent colonoscopy were evaluated, being grouped as having qualified (n = 270) or unqualified (n = 240) colonoscopies based on a CCMEA qualification threshold of 2000. The ADR was 39.5 percentage points higher in the qualified group than in the unqualified group (53.7% vs. 14.2%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 8.0, 95%CI 5.0-12.8; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and notably was higher for lesions ≤5 mm (42.2% vs. 10.0%; aOR 6.9, 95%CI 4.1-11.5; <i>P</i> < 0.001). The qualified group also had a significantly higher polyp detection rate (89.6% vs. 40.0%; aOR 13.1, 95%CI 7.8-21.8; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and higher mean numbers of both adenomas (1.0 vs. 0.2; adjusted incident rate ratio [aIRR] 5.9, 95%CI 4.3-8.4; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and polyps (5.8 vs. 1.3; aIRR 4.0, 95%CI 3.5-4.5; <i>P</i> < 0.001).The CCMEA qualified group, based on a CCMEA threshold of 2000, showed a higher ADR than the unqualified group, indicating CCMEA could be a promising colonoscopy quality indicator.

EndoscopyVol. 58(03)
Wuhan University (CN), Hebei Yiling Hospital (CN), First Hospital of Shijiazhuang (CN), Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University (CN), The Eighth Hospital of Xi'an (CN), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada) (CA), First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Wuhan University, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.