Implementing Network Governance in Natural Resources Management: Evidence From Water Protection Networks in Brazil

ABSTRACT The extant literature largely ignores the micro‐governance of collaborative networks (CNs), that is, the day‐to‐day functions that CN coordinators need to perform to produce a collaborative environment that stimulates joint action. This paper aims to identify which configurations of micro‐governance functions foster an internal collaborative environment in CNs. We collected data from 36 CNs for water protection in Brazil and performed a Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). Results show two configurations that may be adopted in different situations. Although the first configuration requires all six micro‐governance functions to be performed, the second one does not require high monitoring. This configuration is adopted by CNs whose stakeholders do not have a previous history of conflict. Our study advances the theory of collaborative governance by empirically demonstrating how micro‐governance functions enable effective implementation in natural resources management. We contribute to the practice of collaborative governance by describing how CN coordinators may enhance their day‐to‐day activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Policy and Governance
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.70017
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing Network Governance in Natural Resources Management: Evidence From Water Protection Networks in Brazil

Jorge Renato Verschoore, Marcelo Fernandes Pacheco Dias, Douglas Wegner
Environmental Policy and Governance
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

Implementing Network Governance in Natural Resources Management: Evidence From Water Protection Networks in Brazil

Jorge Renato Verschoore, Marcelo Fernandes Pacheco Dias, Douglas Wegner
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The extant literature largely ignores the micro‐governance of collaborative networks (CNs), that is, the day‐to‐day functions that CN coordinators need to perform to produce a collaborative environment that stimulates joint action. This paper aims to identify which configurations of micro‐governance functions foster an internal collaborative environment in CNs. We collected data from 36 CNs for water protection in Brazil and performed a Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). Results show two configurations that may be adopted in different situations. Although the first configuration requires all six micro‐governance functions to be performed, the second one does not require high monitoring. This configuration is adopted by CNs whose stakeholders do not have a previous history of conflict. Our study advances the theory of collaborative governance by empirically demonstrating how micro‐governance functions enable effective implementation in natural resources management. We contribute to the practice of collaborative governance by describing how CN coordinators may enhance their day‐to‐day activities.

Environmental Policy and GovernanceVol. 35(6)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Universidade Federal de Pelotas (BR), Ruhrverband (Germany) (DE), Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (BR), Fundação Dom Cabral (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Universitätsallianz Ruhr
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.