Clinical implications of computer-aided real-time size estimation of colorectal polyps during colonoscopy: a prospective study

Accurate polyp size estimation during colonoscopy is crucial for clinical decision making, follow-up, and implementation of cost-saving strategies. Objective sizing methods are lacking, and interobserver variability is high. This prospective, multicenter, study evaluated the accuracy of a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm for polyp size estimation.Patient aged ≥18 years undergoing colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening or surveillance were enrolled across three centers. Polyp size was initially assessed by operators using forceps/snare comparison (ground truth). Procedures were recorded, and AI-based polyp size estimates were obtained offline. The primary outcome was AI accuracy in size class determination (diminutive ≤5 mm, small 6-9 mm, large ≥10 mm). Secondary outcomes included size estimation in mm and impact on clinical management strategies.Among 465 polyps (307 diminutive, 107 small, 51 large) from 217 patients (mean age 61.9 [SD 10.4] years, 51.6% female), AI accuracy for size class determination was 85.8% (95%CI 82.5-88.8). Accuracy for diminutive, small, and large polyps was 93.3%, 74.6%, and 55.1%, respectively. The AI tool assigned 90.8% of patients to correct surveillance intervals and achieved mean absolute error of 1.13 mm and root mean square error of 1.40 mm for polyps ≤10 mm.The AI model performed similarly to expert endoscopists in clinically relevant size-related outcomes, potentially improving the accuracy and efficiency of CRC screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2695-1978
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical implications of computer-aided real-time size estimation of colorectal polyps during colonoscopy: a prospective study

Giulio Antonelli, Piercarlo Farris, Sara Schiavone, Federico Desideri et al.
1 citations
Endoscopy
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
article

Clinical implications of computer-aided real-time size estimation of colorectal polyps during colonoscopy: a prospective study

Giulio Antonelli, Piercarlo Farris, Sara Schiavone, Federico Desideri, Federico Iacopini, A. Dequarti, Nazario Bevilacqua, Cesare Hassan, Rosanna Sossi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Accurate polyp size estimation during colonoscopy is crucial for clinical decision making, follow-up, and implementation of cost-saving strategies. Objective sizing methods are lacking, and interobserver variability is high. This prospective, multicenter, study evaluated the accuracy of a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm for polyp size estimation.Patient aged ≥18 years undergoing colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening or surveillance were enrolled across three centers. Polyp size was initially assessed by operators using forceps/snare comparison (ground truth). Procedures were recorded, and AI-based polyp size estimates were obtained offline. The primary outcome was AI accuracy in size class determination (diminutive ≤5 mm, small 6-9 mm, large ≥10 mm). Secondary outcomes included size estimation in mm and impact on clinical management strategies.Among 465 polyps (307 diminutive, 107 small, 51 large) from 217 patients (mean age 61.9 [SD 10.4] years, 51.6% female), AI accuracy for size class determination was 85.8% (95%CI 82.5-88.8). Accuracy for diminutive, small, and large polyps was 93.3%, 74.6%, and 55.1%, respectively. The AI tool assigned 90.8% of patients to correct surveillance intervals and achieved mean absolute error of 1.13 mm and root mean square error of 1.40 mm for polyps ≤10 mm.The AI model performed similarly to expert endoscopists in clinically relevant size-related outcomes, potentially improving the accuracy and efficiency of CRC screening.

EndoscopyVol. 58(03)
Humanitas University (IT), Ospedale di Bolzano (IT), Ospedale Koelliker (IT), Ospedale San Giuseppe (IT), Ospedale SS. Annunziata (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Ospedale Civile di Venezia (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.