Carbon Emission Prediction: A Classification and Evaluation of Traditional and Data-Driven Methods

Accurate carbon emission forecasts are extremely important for climate policy formulation and carbon emission assessments. This paper divides prediction technologies into three categories: traditional statistical models, machine learning and deep learning models, and hybrid frameworks. Existing models such as STIRPAT, ARIMA and GM(1,1) are highly explanatory but difficult to deal with nonlinear mechanisms or data analysis. On the contrary, data-driven methods represented by Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) have high prediction accuracy but usually lack transparency. The hybrid approach combines grey neural networks with the Economic Complexity Index (ECI) and Green Complexity Index (GCI) to improve prediction accuracy and overall performance and transcend the constraints of a single country's context. Interpretability tools such as SHAP and LIME are increasingly used to clarify model logical transparency and support strategy development. In short, integrating interpretability, multi-source data fusion and policy-oriented scenario simulation are of great significance to improving the scientificity and practicality of carbon emission prediction tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical and Natural Science
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-8818/2025.dl26465
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon Emission Prediction: A Classification and Evaluation of Traditional and Data-Driven Methods

Jingting Yang
Theoretical and Natural Science
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Carbon Emission Prediction: A Classification and Evaluation of Traditional and Data-Driven Methods

Jingting Yang
article en

Abstract

Accurate carbon emission forecasts are extremely important for climate policy formulation and carbon emission assessments. This paper divides prediction technologies into three categories: traditional statistical models, machine learning and deep learning models, and hybrid frameworks. Existing models such as STIRPAT, ARIMA and GM(1,1) are highly explanatory but difficult to deal with nonlinear mechanisms or data analysis. On the contrary, data-driven methods represented by Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) have high prediction accuracy but usually lack transparency. The hybrid approach combines grey neural networks with the Economic Complexity Index (ECI) and Green Complexity Index (GCI) to improve prediction accuracy and overall performance and transcend the constraints of a single country's context. Interpretability tools such as SHAP and LIME are increasingly used to clarify model logical transparency and support strategy development. In short, integrating interpretability, multi-source data fusion and policy-oriented scenario simulation are of great significance to improving the scientificity and practicality of carbon emission prediction tools.

Theoretical and Natural ScienceVol. 130(1)
Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Carbon Emission Prediction: A Classification and Evaluation of Traditional and Data-Driven Methods — Jingting Yang · Theoretical and Natural Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS