The Dependency of Bar Formation Timescale on Disk Mass Fraction, Toomre <i>Q</i>, and Scale Height

Abstract Bars are one of the most prominent galactic structures. The classical swing-amplification theory can qualitatively describe the spontaneous bar instability of stellar disks. Still, it cannot quantify the bar formation process or explain why some disk galaxies do not have a bar. Recent studies found that the bar formation timescale depends exponentially on the disk mass fraction of the host galaxy (dubbed as “Fujii relation”), but they only explored a limited parameter space, where the physical effects of Toomre Q (local disk stability parameter) and disk scale height of the host galaxies are not fully explored. In this work, we check the robustness of the Fujii relation in a higher-dimensional parameter space of disk mass fraction, Toomre Q , and scale height. We find that the Fujii relation holds for disk galaxies with physically reasonable Toomre Q and scale height. Furthermore, the bar formation timescale also approximately linearly depends on both Toomre Q and scale height, with a more prolonged bar formation in a hotter or thicker disk. We propose an empirical relation to combine the dependency of the bar formation timescale on the three parameters. Based on the empirical relation and recent observations, we estimate that the bar formation timescale in pure stellar disks ranges from <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.06</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.09</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> to <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mn>12.2</mml:mn> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2.80</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3.37</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> Gyr or even significantly beyond the Hubble timescale in some extreme cases.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adf966
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Dependency of Bar Formation Timescale on Disk Mass Fraction, Toomre Q, and Scale Height

Bin-Hui Chen, Juntai Shen
4 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
4.62
article

The Dependency of Bar Formation Timescale on Disk Mass Fraction, Toomre Q, and Scale Height

Bin-Hui Chen, Juntai Shen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Bars are one of the most prominent galactic structures. The classical swing-amplification theory can qualitatively describe the spontaneous bar instability of stellar disks. Still, it cannot quantify the bar formation process or explain why some disk galaxies do not have a bar. Recent studies found that the bar formation timescale depends exponentially on the disk mass fraction of the host galaxy (dubbed as “Fujii relation”), but they only explored a limited parameter space, where the physical effects of Toomre Q (local disk stability parameter) and disk scale height of the host galaxies are not fully explored. In this work, we check the robustness of the Fujii relation in a higher-dimensional parameter space of disk mass fraction, Toomre Q , and scale height. We find that the Fujii relation holds for disk galaxies with physically reasonable Toomre Q and scale height. Furthermore, the bar formation timescale also approximately linearly depends on both Toomre Q and scale height, with a more prolonged bar formation in a hotter or thicker disk. We propose an empirical relation to combine the dependency of the bar formation timescale on the three parameters. Based on the empirical relation and recent observations, we estimate that the bar formation timescale in pure stellar disks ranges from <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.06</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.09</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> to <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mn>12.2</mml:mn> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2.80</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3.37</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> Gyr or even significantly beyond the Hubble timescale in some extreme cases.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 990(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
4.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.