Agentive and non-agentive light verb constructions in Pahari-Pothwari

Abstract This paper investigates two classes of Pahari-Pothwari (an understudied South Asian language) light verb constructions (LVCs), which comprise a light verb (LV) and nominal/adjectival/verbal coverb, forming one single verbal predicate. It is shown that four LVs contribute minimally two lexical semantic features: agentivity and, in a subset of cases, causation via language-internal and external diagnostics (Cruse 1973: 11–23). The agentivity distinction coincides with case marking patterns: non-agentive LVs e ‘come’ and lag ‘attach’ are restricted to an accusative/dative case marked experiencer subject; agentive LVs maɾ ‘hit’ and kaɾ ‘do’ are restricted to an ergative/nominative case subject. Using a series of morphosyntactic and syntactic diagnostics, the study shows that nominal coverbs are morphosyntactically distinct from nominal complements, despite sharing some surface properties. The data indicates that the LV and coverb contribute to the argument structure, and there are possible combinatory restrictions of N + V LVCs, which can give an insight into the status of nominal coverbs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jsall-2025-0010
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agentive and non-agentive light verb constructions in Pahari-Pothwari

Farah Nazir
Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

Agentive and non-agentive light verb constructions in Pahari-Pothwari

Farah Nazir
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates two classes of Pahari-Pothwari (an understudied South Asian language) light verb constructions (LVCs), which comprise a light verb (LV) and nominal/adjectival/verbal coverb, forming one single verbal predicate. It is shown that four LVs contribute minimally two lexical semantic features: agentivity and, in a subset of cases, causation via language-internal and external diagnostics (Cruse 1973: 11–23). The agentivity distinction coincides with case marking patterns: non-agentive LVs e ‘come’ and lag ‘attach’ are restricted to an accusative/dative case marked experiencer subject; agentive LVs maɾ ‘hit’ and kaɾ ‘do’ are restricted to an ergative/nominative case subject. Using a series of morphosyntactic and syntactic diagnostics, the study shows that nominal coverbs are morphosyntactically distinct from nominal complements, despite sharing some surface properties. The data indicates that the LV and coverb contribute to the argument structure, and there are possible combinatory restrictions of N + V LVCs, which can give an insight into the status of nominal coverbs.

Journal of South Asian Languages and LinguisticsVol. 12(2)
University of York (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.