Electrochemical disinfection of urban stormwater: Implications for reuse safety

Electrochemical disinfection works for wastewater but may not apply directly to stormwater due to its lower conductivity. This study assessed electrochemical stormwater disinfection using SnO₂-Sb₂O₃, RuO₂-IrO₂, and Pt-coated anodes, evaluating efficiency, mechanisms, and energy costs. Results demonstrated that the SnO₂-Sb₂O₃ anode outperformed the others, achieving higher E.coli inactivation rates, lower energy consumption, and cost-effectiveness. The log inactivation ratio at 2 mA/cm 2 reached 1.08, 0.45 and 3.47 for RuO₂-IrO₂, Pt-coated and SnO₂-Sb₂O₃ anodes, respectively. The primary mechanism was chlorination, with reactive oxygen species (·OH and ·O₂⁻) playing a minor role. Chlorination (adding chlorine to form reactive chlorine species) inactivated bacteria by damaging cell membranes, degrading DNA, and altering proteins. Energy consumption analysis suggested that optimal operating conditions depended on target priorities: maximizing inactivation efficiency and/or minimizing energy use. For example, the optimized scenarios (SnO₂-Sb₂O₃ anode) included that for ≥3.00-log inactivation, the most energy-efficient condition was 2 mA/cm², 10 min (0.14 kW·h/m³/log) while at ≤1.00 kW·h/m³/log, the top-performing condition was 3 mA/cm², 45 min (3.68-log inactivation). The results also showed that bacteria reactivation can occur during subsequent storage of stormwater, with varying characteristics depending on the water source. The optical density at 600 nm (OD 600 ) in blank group remained low (<0.2), while stormwater exhibited bacterial regrowth, with arterial road runoff peaking at 0.5 and roof/rainwater at near 0.3 by day 9 of storage. This means that stored stormwater needs to undergo secondary disinfection before reuse to ensure safety. Results informed practical electrochemical disinfection guidelines and future research priorities for stormwater treatment. • Electrochemical disinfection, effective for wastewater, was tested for stormwater. • Stormwater from different sources affected electrochemical disinfection efficiency • Bacteria regrew after electrochemical disinfection depending on stormwater sources • Optimal operation depends on balancing efficiency and energy use

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2025.104488
Primary Topic
Water Treatment and Disinfection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electrochemical disinfection of urban stormwater: Implications for reuse safety

An Liu, Peng Jin, Han Shuai, Xiang Zhao et al.
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Water Treatment and Disinfection
article

Electrochemical disinfection of urban stormwater: Implications for reuse safety

An Liu, Peng Jin, Han Shuai, Xiang Zhao, Liting Luo, Quansi Ou
article en

Abstract

Electrochemical disinfection works for wastewater but may not apply directly to stormwater due to its lower conductivity. This study assessed electrochemical stormwater disinfection using SnO₂-Sb₂O₃, RuO₂-IrO₂, and Pt-coated anodes, evaluating efficiency, mechanisms, and energy costs. Results demonstrated that the SnO₂-Sb₂O₃ anode outperformed the others, achieving higher E.coli inactivation rates, lower energy consumption, and cost-effectiveness. The log inactivation ratio at 2 mA/cm 2 reached 1.08, 0.45 and 3.47 for RuO₂-IrO₂, Pt-coated and SnO₂-Sb₂O₃ anodes, respectively. The primary mechanism was chlorination, with reactive oxygen species (·OH and ·O₂⁻) playing a minor role. Chlorination (adding chlorine to form reactive chlorine species) inactivated bacteria by damaging cell membranes, degrading DNA, and altering proteins. Energy consumption analysis suggested that optimal operating conditions depended on target priorities: maximizing inactivation efficiency and/or minimizing energy use. For example, the optimized scenarios (SnO₂-Sb₂O₃ anode) included that for ≥3.00-log inactivation, the most energy-efficient condition was 2 mA/cm², 10 min (0.14 kW·h/m³/log) while at ≤1.00 kW·h/m³/log, the top-performing condition was 3 mA/cm², 45 min (3.68-log inactivation). The results also showed that bacteria reactivation can occur during subsequent storage of stormwater, with varying characteristics depending on the water source. The optical density at 600 nm (OD 600 ) in blank group remained low (<0.2), while stormwater exhibited bacterial regrowth, with arterial road runoff peaking at 0.5 and roof/rainwater at near 0.3 by day 9 of storage. This means that stored stormwater needs to undergo secondary disinfection before reuse to ensure safety. Results informed practical electrochemical disinfection guidelines and future research priorities for stormwater treatment. • Electrochemical disinfection, effective for wastewater, was tested for stormwater. • Stormwater from different sources affected electrochemical disinfection efficiency • Bacteria regrew after electrochemical disinfection depending on stormwater sources • Optimal operation depends on balancing efficiency and energy use

Environmental Technology & InnovationVol. 40
Shenzhen University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality, Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Program, Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Water Treatment and Disinfection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.