Creating a Community of Diamond OA Practitioners: A Case Study from Switzerland

(Watch the RECORDING.) The further development of the Diamond Open Access (DOA) publishing ecosystem as a robust and sustainable open access route relies on the engagement and collective efforts of academic libraries, journal editors, researchers, and research funding organisations. However, each of these actors follows its own (institutional) logic and priorities: libraries focus on supporting their institutional members; journal editors aim to shape their research fields; researchers pursue academic careers; and funding organisations strive to promote research excellence in a competitive environment. Against the backdrop of the Platinum Open Access Funding (PLATO) project – which aimed to engage these communities in building momentum around Diamond OA – this presentation shares insights into how a community of practice is emerging among DOA journal editors in Switzerland. Many of these editors work voluntarily and see their journals as a “service to their research community”. In a scholar-led publishing system such as Diamond OA, journal editors play a key role in maintaining academic standards, overseeing rigorous peer review, upholding ethical publishing practices, and connecting with research communities. At the same time, the international “OA Diamond Journals Study” (Bosman et al., 2021), along with the PLATO landscape study on scholar-led journals in Switzerland, has shown that Diamond OA journals operate within a fragmented, archipelago-like landscape of publishing outlets and (institutional) infrastructures. This presentation will focus on a case study from Switzerland, where the PLATO project sought to amplify the agency of these journals – financially, institutionally, and symbolically – by making them more visible (through the creation of a journal database) and supporting the establishment of an association of Diamond OA journal editors. By centering the voices of editors, this presentation reflects on how bottom-up initiatives can shape the Diamond OA ecosystem and discusses ways to move from fragmented efforts to coordinated, systemic action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Septentrio Conference Series
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7557/5.8170
Primary Topic
Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creating a Community of Diamond OA Practitioners: A Case Study from Switzerland

Daniela Hahn
Septentrio Conference Series
Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts
article

Creating a Community of Diamond OA Practitioners: A Case Study from Switzerland

Daniela Hahn
article en

Abstract

(Watch the RECORDING.) The further development of the Diamond Open Access (DOA) publishing ecosystem as a robust and sustainable open access route relies on the engagement and collective efforts of academic libraries, journal editors, researchers, and research funding organisations. However, each of these actors follows its own (institutional) logic and priorities: libraries focus on supporting their institutional members; journal editors aim to shape their research fields; researchers pursue academic careers; and funding organisations strive to promote research excellence in a competitive environment. Against the backdrop of the Platinum Open Access Funding (PLATO) project – which aimed to engage these communities in building momentum around Diamond OA – this presentation shares insights into how a community of practice is emerging among DOA journal editors in Switzerland. Many of these editors work voluntarily and see their journals as a “service to their research community”. In a scholar-led publishing system such as Diamond OA, journal editors play a key role in maintaining academic standards, overseeing rigorous peer review, upholding ethical publishing practices, and connecting with research communities. At the same time, the international “OA Diamond Journals Study” (Bosman et al., 2021), along with the PLATO landscape study on scholar-led journals in Switzerland, has shown that Diamond OA journals operate within a fragmented, archipelago-like landscape of publishing outlets and (institutional) infrastructures. This presentation will focus on a case study from Switzerland, where the PLATO project sought to amplify the agency of these journals – financially, institutionally, and symbolically – by making them more visible (through the creation of a journal database) and supporting the establishment of an association of Diamond OA journal editors. By centering the voices of editors, this presentation reflects on how bottom-up initiatives can shape the Diamond OA ecosystem and discusses ways to move from fragmented efforts to coordinated, systemic action.

Septentrio Conference Series(2)
Consortium of Academic and Research Libraries in Illinois (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.