Effectiveness of the Stage 4 Smart Insulin Pen DIA:CONN P8 for Glycemic Control in a Real-World Setting

This study evaluated whether a stage 4 smart insulin pen (SIP) provides superior glycemic control compared with a traditional insulin pen (TIP) in individuals with intensively insulin-treated diabetes. Forty-two adults with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), multiple daily insulin injections, and no prior SIP use were included. After diabetes self-management education (DSME), the SIP group (n=21) initiated SIP, whereas the TIP group (n=21) continued their usual regimens. Glycemic metrics were assessed using CGM before and 2 weeks after DSME. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in glycemic outcomes. However, SIP users exhibited superior improvements in the percentage of time in range, percentage of time below range (%TBR) <70 mg/dL, %TBR <54 mg/dL, and glycemic risk index compared with TIP users (between-group difference [BD] 11.0%, P=0.046; BD -2.6%, P=0.024; BD -0.9%, P=0.027; BD -18.2, P=0.022, respectively). These findings suggest that SIP, with its bolus calculation and CGM integration, is associated with improved glycemic outcomes in adults with intensively insulin-treated diabetes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2025.0112
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of the Stage 4 Smart Insulin Pen DIA:CONN P8 for Glycemic Control in a Real-World Setting

So Yoon Kwon, Hojoong Kwak, Jae Hyeon Kim
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal
Diabetes Management and Research
article

Effectiveness of the Stage 4 Smart Insulin Pen DIA:CONN P8 for Glycemic Control in a Real-World Setting

So Yoon Kwon, Hojoong Kwak, Jae Hyeon Kim
article en

Abstract

This study evaluated whether a stage 4 smart insulin pen (SIP) provides superior glycemic control compared with a traditional insulin pen (TIP) in individuals with intensively insulin-treated diabetes. Forty-two adults with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), multiple daily insulin injections, and no prior SIP use were included. After diabetes self-management education (DSME), the SIP group (n=21) initiated SIP, whereas the TIP group (n=21) continued their usual regimens. Glycemic metrics were assessed using CGM before and 2 weeks after DSME. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in glycemic outcomes. However, SIP users exhibited superior improvements in the percentage of time in range, percentage of time below range (%TBR) <70 mg/dL, %TBR <54 mg/dL, and glycemic risk index compared with TIP users (between-group difference [BD] 11.0%, P=0.046; BD -2.6%, P=0.024; BD -0.9%, P=0.027; BD -18.2, P=0.022, respectively). These findings suggest that SIP, with its bolus calculation and CGM integration, is associated with improved glycemic outcomes in adults with intensively insulin-treated diabetes.

Diabetes & Metabolism Journal
Samsung Medical Center (KR), Daegu Catholic University Medical Center (KR), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Diabetes Management and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.