Analyzing point of care tools through faculty, resident, and stakeholder buy-in: promise and pitfalls
Costs for UpToDate, the library's primary point of care clinical tool, had increased to half of the acquisitions budget but without user affiliation data to facilitate cost sharing. A working group led by librarians was formed to review alternatives. Surveys indicated users preferred UpToDate and renewal was recommended by the working group, with costs being shared between the academic unit and the hospital. These results showed that the library can effectively lead analysis projects with this level of visibility, but persuading users to consider alternatives to a trusted tool can be challenging.
Authors
- J. Michael Lindsay (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1941-8581)
- Martha Earl (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7933-1571)
Institutions
- University of Tennessee Medical Center (US)
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Medical Reference Services Quarterly
- Published
- 2025-09-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2025.2550954
- Primary Topic
- Health Sciences Research and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00