Mobilising safety? Public order and the coordination of security guards in public transport in Stockholm

This study contributes to the growing literature on mobile work by examining the coordination of safety practices in public transport in Stockholm. We explore how safety, a critical and evolving theme in mobility studies, intersects with mobile work and its associated coordination challenges. Since the introduction of safety policies, security guards have focused on ‘circulatory maintenance’, a process gaining prominence in Stockholm’s public transport system. Using Suchman’s framework on centers of coordination, we identify three key practices of ‘circulatory maintenance’: coordination by education, technology and evaluation. These practices reveal that safety is not static but an ongoing, dynamic process involving formal policies, procurement efforts, and frontline workers’ situated, improvisational actions, often mediated through the ‘Safety Centre’. While these practices exhibit how mobile work is coordinated, it also signifies which efforts are put in place to ensure order in the public space that public transport is. We conclude by raising critical questions about the justification of such practices in addressing safety concerns in public transport.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mobilities
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2025.2542171
Primary Topic
Policing Practices and Perceptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mobilising safety? Public order and the coordination of security guards in public transport in Stockholm

Linnea Eriksson, Jens Alm, Alexander Paulsson
1 links
Mobilities
Policing Practices and Perceptions
article

Mobilising safety? Public order and the coordination of security guards in public transport in Stockholm

Linnea Eriksson, Jens Alm, Alexander Paulsson
article en

Abstract

This study contributes to the growing literature on mobile work by examining the coordination of safety practices in public transport in Stockholm. We explore how safety, a critical and evolving theme in mobility studies, intersects with mobile work and its associated coordination challenges. Since the introduction of safety policies, security guards have focused on ‘circulatory maintenance’, a process gaining prominence in Stockholm’s public transport system. Using Suchman’s framework on centers of coordination, we identify three key practices of ‘circulatory maintenance’: coordination by education, technology and evaluation. These practices reveal that safety is not static but an ongoing, dynamic process involving formal policies, procurement efforts, and frontline workers’ situated, improvisational actions, often mediated through the ‘Safety Centre’. While these practices exhibit how mobile work is coordinated, it also signifies which efforts are put in place to ensure order in the public space that public transport is. We conclude by raising critical questions about the justification of such practices in addressing safety concerns in public transport.

Mobilities
Transport Research Institute (RO), Lund University (SE), National Library of Sweden (SE), Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Policing Practices and Perceptions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mobilising safety? Public order and the coordination of security guards in public transport in Stockholm — Linnea Eriksson, Jens Alm, et al. · Mobilities (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS