Encorafenib with binimetinib efficacy in the first, second, and third line of treatment for patients with advanced melanoma harboring a BRAF mutation — real-world study

Introduction. In patients with advanced melanoma with BRAF mutation, the BRAF and MEK inhibitors can be used before or after immunotherapy, and even as third-line systemic treatment. To date, majority of available data on encorafenib plus binimetinib comes from clinical trials. Material and methods. This was a multicenter retrospective study, which aimed to investigate the efficacy of encorafenib plus binimetinib (E+B) treatment in patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma in the real-world setting. The study did not include patients treated with adjuvant intent. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) estimates were obtained using Kaplan-Meier method. Results. There were 130 patients treated in the first-line setting. Their median follow-up was 24.1 (95% CI 20.9–32) months. Median age of the group treated with E+B first line treatment was 63.5 years and LDH level was abnormal in 53.1% of cases, while 25.4% of patients had brain metastases. The median PFS was 10.3 (95% CI 8–12.4) months, 1- and 3-year PFSs were 40.1% (95% CI 31.9–50.3) and 12.3% (95% CI 6.1–24.7), while the objective response rate (ORR) was 58.5%. After the progression of the disease, 32 (24.6%) patients received second-line treatment (including immunotherapy in 28, 87.5% cases) and 5 (3.8%) patients received third-line treatment. The median OS from the start of the first-line treatment was 15.8 (95% CI 12–23.5) months, while the 1-year and 3-year OS rates were 58% (95% CI 49.6–67.9) and 20% (95% CI 11.9–33.6), respectively. In the second-line treatment, after the anti-PD-1-based first-line treatment, the E+B was administered in 82 patients. The median PFS was 8.5 (95% CI 6.5–12) months, and the ORR was 42 (51.2%). The median OS from the start of the second-line treatment was 13.2 (95% CI 10.9–22) months. In the third-line treatment, E+B was used in 23 patients, with 6- and 12-month PFS being 23% (95% CI 10.7–49.6), and 13.8% (95% CI 4.8–39.4), respectively. The median PFS in third-line setting was 3.6 (95% CI 2.8–5.3) months. Conclusions. This real-world evidence supports the clinically meaningful efficacy of the combination of E+B in first-, second- and third-line treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oncology in Clinical Practice
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5603/ocp.107991
Primary Topic
Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Encorafenib with binimetinib efficacy in the first, second, and third line of treatment for patients with advanced melanoma harboring a BRAF mutation — real-world study

Marta Pabianek, Jacek Mackiewicz, Magdalena Ciążyńska, Natasza Kempa-Kamińska et al.
Oncology in Clinical Practice
Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
article

Encorafenib with binimetinib efficacy in the first, second, and third line of treatment for patients with advanced melanoma harboring a BRAF mutation — real-world study

Marta Pabianek, Jacek Mackiewicz, Magdalena Ciążyńska, Natasza Kempa-Kamińska, Marcin Ziętek, Tomasz Kubiatowski, Katarzyna Krawczak, Paweł Rogala, Anna Malgorzata Czarnecka, Łukasz Galus, Grażyna Kamińska‐Winciorek, Piotr Rutkowski, Robert Dziura, Katarzyna Kozak, Wiesław Bal, Bożena Cybulska-Stopa, Piotr Błoński, Krzysztof Ostraszewski
article en

Abstract

Introduction. In patients with advanced melanoma with BRAF mutation, the BRAF and MEK inhibitors can be used before or after immunotherapy, and even as third-line systemic treatment. To date, majority of available data on encorafenib plus binimetinib comes from clinical trials. Material and methods. This was a multicenter retrospective study, which aimed to investigate the efficacy of encorafenib plus binimetinib (E+B) treatment in patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma in the real-world setting. The study did not include patients treated with adjuvant intent. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) estimates were obtained using Kaplan-Meier method. Results. There were 130 patients treated in the first-line setting. Their median follow-up was 24.1 (95% CI 20.9–32) months. Median age of the group treated with E+B first line treatment was 63.5 years and LDH level was abnormal in 53.1% of cases, while 25.4% of patients had brain metastases. The median PFS was 10.3 (95% CI 8–12.4) months, 1- and 3-year PFSs were 40.1% (95% CI 31.9–50.3) and 12.3% (95% CI 6.1–24.7), while the objective response rate (ORR) was 58.5%. After the progression of the disease, 32 (24.6%) patients received second-line treatment (including immunotherapy in 28, 87.5% cases) and 5 (3.8%) patients received third-line treatment. The median OS from the start of the first-line treatment was 15.8 (95% CI 12–23.5) months, while the 1-year and 3-year OS rates were 58% (95% CI 49.6–67.9) and 20% (95% CI 11.9–33.6), respectively. In the second-line treatment, after the anti-PD-1-based first-line treatment, the E+B was administered in 82 patients. The median PFS was 8.5 (95% CI 6.5–12) months, and the ORR was 42 (51.2%). The median OS from the start of the second-line treatment was 13.2 (95% CI 10.9–22) months. In the third-line treatment, E+B was used in 23 patients, with 6- and 12-month PFS being 23% (95% CI 10.7–49.6), and 13.8% (95% CI 4.8–39.4), respectively. The median PFS in third-line setting was 3.6 (95% CI 2.8–5.3) months. Conclusions. This real-world evidence supports the clinically meaningful efficacy of the combination of E+B in first-, second- and third-line treatment.

Oncology in Clinical PracticeVol. 22(0)
Wrocław University of Science and Technology (PL), Poznan University of Medical Sciences (PL), Medical University of Warsaw (PL), Wroclaw Medical University (PL), Greater Poland Cancer Center (PL), National Institute of Oncology (HU), Holy Cross University (PL), Medical University of Lodz (PL), Chemotherapy Foundation (US), Lublin Oncology Center (PL), Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital Research Institute (PL), Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz (PL), The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (PL), AGH University of Krakow (PL), University of Rzeszów (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.