Peirce in the Machine: How Mixture of Experts Models Perform Hypothesis Construction

Abstract Mixture of experts is a prediction aggregation method in machine learning that aggregates the predictions of specialized experts. This method often outperforms Bayesian methods despite the Bayesian having stronger inductive guarantees. We argue that this is due to the greater functional capacity of mixture of experts. We prove that in a limiting case, mixture of experts will have greater capacity than equivalent Bayesian methods, which we vouchsafe through experiments on non-limiting cases. Finally, we conclude that mixture of experts is a type of abductive reasoning in the Peircean sense of hypothesis construction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy of Science
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2025.10159
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peirce in the Machine: How Mixture of Experts Models Perform Hypothesis Construction

Bruce Rushing
1 citations
Philosophy of Science
Philosophy and History of Science
18.02
article

Peirce in the Machine: How Mixture of Experts Models Perform Hypothesis Construction

Bruce Rushing
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Mixture of experts is a prediction aggregation method in machine learning that aggregates the predictions of specialized experts. This method often outperforms Bayesian methods despite the Bayesian having stronger inductive guarantees. We argue that this is due to the greater functional capacity of mixture of experts. We prove that in a limiting case, mixture of experts will have greater capacity than equivalent Bayesian methods, which we vouchsafe through experiments on non-limiting cases. Finally, we conclude that mixture of experts is a type of abductive reasoning in the Peircean sense of hypothesis construction.

Philosophy of Science
University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Philosophy and History of Science
18.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.