Who Decides When Artificial Intelligence Works? Algorithmic Production as a Continuous Evaluation Process

The intensifying deployment of AI systems in different spheres of our lives has raised concerns over their evaluation. The latter has often been discussed as a unified process that any model should undergo before its release and use. However, we argue that throughout their production AI systems are continuously assessed. A closer look at their supply chains reveal modes and practices of evaluation at each stage of their development. Based on empirical research of three sites of AI development, this article provides evidence for this continuous assessment. It points to the limits of common perspectives on AI evaluation and argues for a more grounded and comprehensive understanding of the ways in which AI systems can be and are assessed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Society
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-025-00224-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Decides When Artificial Intelligence Works? Algorithmic Production as a Continuous Evaluation Process

Maxime Cornet, Camille Girard-Chanudet, Clément Le Ludec, A. Wirth
1 citations
Digital Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Who Decides When Artificial Intelligence Works? Algorithmic Production as a Continuous Evaluation Process

Maxime Cornet, Camille Girard-Chanudet, Clément Le Ludec, A. Wirth
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The intensifying deployment of AI systems in different spheres of our lives has raised concerns over their evaluation. The latter has often been discussed as a unified process that any model should undergo before its release and use. However, we argue that throughout their production AI systems are continuously assessed. A closer look at their supply chains reveal modes and practices of evaluation at each stage of their development. Based on empirical research of three sites of AI development, this article provides evidence for this continuous assessment. It points to the limits of common perspectives on AI evaluation and argues for a more grounded and comprehensive understanding of the ways in which AI systems can be and are assessed.

Digital SocietyVol. 4(3)
Université Paris-Panthéon-Assas (FR), Télécom Paris (FR), Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers (FR), Orange (France) (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Université Paris-Saclay
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who Decides When Artificial Intelligence Works? Algorithmic Production as a Continuous Evaluation Process — Maxime Cornet, Camille Girard-Chanudet, et al. · Digital Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS