Amos amongst the <i>nōqdīm</i> : Navigating agrarian class conflict in the book of Amos

This paper proposes that Amos’s designation as a נקד‎ conveniently aligns the class position of the eponymous prophet with that of lower-ranking scribal elites. Given the likelihood that the reference to the נקדים‎ in Amos 1.1 is a redactional insertion, this appears to be a deliberate scribal attempt at indicating that Amos was, like themselves, a member of an administrative-bureaucratic class fraction. This observation invites a reappraisal of the excoriating critiques of social ills embedded in the book’s prophetic oracles. Rather than representing the interests of the peasantry per se, the oracles instead highlight intersections between petty-elite and peasant interests. This perhaps reflects a rhetorical attempt to imply a sense of agrarian solidarity between these social groups, whilst avoiding an institutional critique of the upper echelons of Judah, or Yehud’s, ruling classes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03090892251350704
Primary Topic
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Amos amongst the nōqdīm : Navigating agrarian class conflict in the book of Amos

J. Deans
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
article

Amos amongst the nōqdīm : Navigating agrarian class conflict in the book of Amos

J. Deans
article en

Abstract

This paper proposes that Amos’s designation as a נקד‎ conveniently aligns the class position of the eponymous prophet with that of lower-ranking scribal elites. Given the likelihood that the reference to the נקדים‎ in Amos 1.1 is a redactional insertion, this appears to be a deliberate scribal attempt at indicating that Amos was, like themselves, a member of an administrative-bureaucratic class fraction. This observation invites a reappraisal of the excoriating critiques of social ills embedded in the book’s prophetic oracles. Rather than representing the interests of the peasantry per se, the oracles instead highlight intersections between petty-elite and peasant interests. This perhaps reflects a rhetorical attempt to imply a sense of agrarian solidarity between these social groups, whilst avoiding an institutional critique of the upper echelons of Judah, or Yehud’s, ruling classes.

Journal for the Study of the Old TestamentVol. 50(2)
University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.