Differences Between Users and Non-Users of Dating Apps in Adulthood: Psychological and Social Implications

Since the popularization of dating apps, the scientific literature developed in the last decade still has various limitations that concern both the populations studied and the variables evaluated. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the use of dating apps among adults (25–50 years) and the relationship between the use of these apps and mental, physical and sexual health and substance use. A total of 1004 adults of both sexes (M = 36.61, SD = 7.16; 50.7% women, 49.3% men) participated in the study, filling out a battery of online questionnaires. A 40% prevalence of dating apps use was found. Men, non-heterosexuals, and single people showed higher use of these apps. No relationship was found between the use of dating apps and mental health (self-esteem, anxiety, depression). On the other hand, a direct association was found between being a dating app user and the consumption of substances (tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, cocaine, mental health medication), concern about physical appearance, and the practice of physical exercise. In addition, app users showed better sexual functioning than non-users. The main finding of the study is that there are no differences in mental health (self-esteem, anxiety, depression) between adult users and non-users of dating apps. The results obtained have significant implications both a psychological and social viewpoint. Therefore, they must be considered when implementing prevention and promotion programs for sexual health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexes
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sexes6030049
Primary Topic
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences Between Users and Non-Users of Dating Apps in Adulthood: Psychological and Social Implications

Ángel Castro, Adriana Jiménez-Muro, Pedro J. Ramos‐Villagrasa
Sexes
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
article

Differences Between Users and Non-Users of Dating Apps in Adulthood: Psychological and Social Implications

Ángel Castro, Adriana Jiménez-Muro, Pedro J. Ramos‐Villagrasa
article en

Abstract

Since the popularization of dating apps, the scientific literature developed in the last decade still has various limitations that concern both the populations studied and the variables evaluated. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the use of dating apps among adults (25–50 years) and the relationship between the use of these apps and mental, physical and sexual health and substance use. A total of 1004 adults of both sexes (M = 36.61, SD = 7.16; 50.7% women, 49.3% men) participated in the study, filling out a battery of online questionnaires. A 40% prevalence of dating apps use was found. Men, non-heterosexuals, and single people showed higher use of these apps. No relationship was found between the use of dating apps and mental health (self-esteem, anxiety, depression). On the other hand, a direct association was found between being a dating app user and the consumption of substances (tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, cocaine, mental health medication), concern about physical appearance, and the practice of physical exercise. In addition, app users showed better sexual functioning than non-users. The main finding of the study is that there are no differences in mental health (self-esteem, anxiety, depression) between adult users and non-users of dating apps. The results obtained have significant implications both a psychological and social viewpoint. Therefore, they must be considered when implementing prevention and promotion programs for sexual health.

SexesVol. 6(3)
Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.