Misinformation dissemination and correction in online informal groups: The role of social distance and group dynamics

Online informal groups play a growing role in disseminating and correcting misinformation on social media platforms, yet remain underexamined due to their semi-public nature. This study investigates how misinformation circulates in these groups, focusing on social distance, group status, and interpersonal dynamics. Drawing on Social Distance Theory of Power and Social Exchange Theory, we employed a mixed-methods approach, including non-participant observation, sociometric analysis, and semi-structured interviews across 12 Chinese online groups. Findings indicate that misinformation is often disseminated by socially distant yet structurally central members, while correction efforts come from more socially embedded but less influential participants. Group discussions reinforced trust in misinformation through interpersonal validation and repeated exposure. Correction was constrained by relational risks, making it a socially sensitive act. These insights highlight how group dynamics shape misinformation engagement and suggest the need for socially aware intervention strategies in these digital spaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Media & Society
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251366170
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Misinformation dissemination and correction in online informal groups: The role of social distance and group dynamics

Zengyi Zhang, Pingping Jia
New Media & Society
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Misinformation dissemination and correction in online informal groups: The role of social distance and group dynamics

Zengyi Zhang, Pingping Jia
article en

Abstract

Online informal groups play a growing role in disseminating and correcting misinformation on social media platforms, yet remain underexamined due to their semi-public nature. This study investigates how misinformation circulates in these groups, focusing on social distance, group status, and interpersonal dynamics. Drawing on Social Distance Theory of Power and Social Exchange Theory, we employed a mixed-methods approach, including non-participant observation, sociometric analysis, and semi-structured interviews across 12 Chinese online groups. Findings indicate that misinformation is often disseminated by socially distant yet structurally central members, while correction efforts come from more socially embedded but less influential participants. Group discussions reinforced trust in misinformation through interpersonal validation and repeated exposure. Correction was constrained by relational risks, making it a socially sensitive act. These insights highlight how group dynamics shape misinformation engagement and suggest the need for socially aware intervention strategies in these digital spaces.

New Media & Society
City University of Hong Kong (HK), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.