Relational Commons: An Ontological and Governance Framework Beyond Protected Areas and the Boundaries of Conservation

ABSTRACT As conservation efforts accelerate to meet global targets like 30 × 30, they risk deepening exclusion, enclosure, and ecological fragmentation. We interrogate the legal and institutional foundations of conservation to reveal how territorialization, centralized authority, and human‐nature separation persist in dominant governance models. In response, we propose relational commons as “an ontological and governance framework that centers the interdependence of human and more‐than‐human beings, and the abiotic entities and ecological processes that sustain them, where care for these dynamic relations becomes the basis for shared responsibility and decision‐making.” Relational commons are not tenured spaces but practices that unsettle the illusion that individual rights, fixed boundaries, independence, or human‐centered governance ever provided a meaningful foundation for conservation. Extending commons scholarship, this approach shifts focus from managing resources to cultivating the conditions for multispecies flourishing. We articulate four principles: (1) relations, where rights structure reciprocal responsibilities; (2) power‐sharing, where boundaries become interfaces of collaboration; (3) interdependence, which foregrounds care and co‐flourishing; and (4) multispecies–ecosystem justice, which distributes agency across human and more‐than‐human worlds. Together, these principles offer an inclusive and future‐oriented alternative to fragmented conservation logics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Letters
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.13137
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relational Commons: An Ontological and Governance Framework Beyond Protected Areas and the Boundaries of Conservation

Dru Marsh, Richard T. Kingsford, Benjamin Cooke, Katie Moon
5 citations
Conservation Letters
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
5.53
article

Relational Commons: An Ontological and Governance Framework Beyond Protected Areas and the Boundaries of Conservation

Dru Marsh, Richard T. Kingsford, Benjamin Cooke, Katie Moon
article en
5 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT As conservation efforts accelerate to meet global targets like 30 × 30, they risk deepening exclusion, enclosure, and ecological fragmentation. We interrogate the legal and institutional foundations of conservation to reveal how territorialization, centralized authority, and human‐nature separation persist in dominant governance models. In response, we propose relational commons as “an ontological and governance framework that centers the interdependence of human and more‐than‐human beings, and the abiotic entities and ecological processes that sustain them, where care for these dynamic relations becomes the basis for shared responsibility and decision‐making.” Relational commons are not tenured spaces but practices that unsettle the illusion that individual rights, fixed boundaries, independence, or human‐centered governance ever provided a meaningful foundation for conservation. Extending commons scholarship, this approach shifts focus from managing resources to cultivating the conditions for multispecies flourishing. We articulate four principles: (1) relations, where rights structure reciprocal responsibilities; (2) power‐sharing, where boundaries become interfaces of collaboration; (3) interdependence, which foregrounds care and co‐flourishing; and (4) multispecies–ecosystem justice, which distributes agency across human and more‐than‐human worlds. Together, these principles offer an inclusive and future‐oriented alternative to fragmented conservation logics.

Conservation LettersVol. 18(5)
Australian National University (AU), University of Canberra (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), MIT University (MK), Environmental Earth Sciences (AU), Ecosystem Sciences (AU), UNSW Canberra, RMIT University (AU)
University of New South Wales
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
5.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.