Effect of wearing particulate respirators on physiological changes of healthcare workers in isolation room

Introduction: The use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for healthcare workers must be addressed, especially for procedures that generate aerosols. A standard N95, FFP2 or FFP3 particulate respirator mask is strongly recommended. WHO suggests using a particulate respirator for a maximum of six hours to avoid increasing oxygen debt, fatigue, CO2 levels, and nasal resistance. Methods: This study was observational, using a cross-sectional method conducted from February to April 2022. Participants were healthcare workers (HCWs), including doctors, nurses, and other HCWs who worked in ward of Mawar 1 Isolation Rooms. As screening, the participants underwent a Quantitative Fit Test with PortaCount® Respirator Fit Tester 8038, using particulate masks such as 3M 1870, 3M Vflex 9105, Dreamcan ME01LK, Dreamcan ME0 12.5, and RespoKare that are available in the hospital, while bending over, talking, head side to side, and head up and down. While doing the movement, the Fit Test Score had to reach ≥100. Then, we measured heart rate, oxygen saturation, and respiration rate before they entered and left the isolation rooms. Result: Thirty-one HCWs passed the screening test. One HCW could fit to more than one respirator. Sixteen (41,03%) HCWs fit to 3M Vflex 9105, 10 (25,64%) HCWs fit to Dreamcan ME01LK, 6 (15,38%) HCWs fit to RespoKare, 4 (10,26%) fit to 3M 1870 and 3 (7,69%) fit to Dreamcan ME0 12.5. HCWs served in the isolation room for 74,06 28,18 (35-150) minutes. We found a significant difference in heart and respiration rates before entering and after leaving the isolation room (p<0.05). In contradiction, the study showed no difference in O2 saturation (p=0,06).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.133
Primary Topic
Infection Control and Ventilation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of wearing particulate respirators on physiological changes of healthcare workers in isolation room

Titi Sundari, Pompini Agustina Sitompul, Tri Diani Agustuti, Nina Mariana et al.
Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology
Infection Control and Ventilation
article

Effect of wearing particulate respirators on physiological changes of healthcare workers in isolation room

Titi Sundari, Pompini Agustina Sitompul, Tri Diani Agustuti, Nina Mariana, Aninda Dinar Widiantari, Vivi Setiawaty, Rina Yuliaty, Hotmarida Silalahi, Yustina Melandari
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for healthcare workers must be addressed, especially for procedures that generate aerosols. A standard N95, FFP2 or FFP3 particulate respirator mask is strongly recommended. WHO suggests using a particulate respirator for a maximum of six hours to avoid increasing oxygen debt, fatigue, CO2 levels, and nasal resistance. Methods: This study was observational, using a cross-sectional method conducted from February to April 2022. Participants were healthcare workers (HCWs), including doctors, nurses, and other HCWs who worked in ward of Mawar 1 Isolation Rooms. As screening, the participants underwent a Quantitative Fit Test with PortaCount® Respirator Fit Tester 8038, using particulate masks such as 3M 1870, 3M Vflex 9105, Dreamcan ME01LK, Dreamcan ME0 12.5, and RespoKare that are available in the hospital, while bending over, talking, head side to side, and head up and down. While doing the movement, the Fit Test Score had to reach ≥100. Then, we measured heart rate, oxygen saturation, and respiration rate before they entered and left the isolation rooms. Result: Thirty-one HCWs passed the screening test. One HCW could fit to more than one respirator. Sixteen (41,03%) HCWs fit to 3M Vflex 9105, 10 (25,64%) HCWs fit to Dreamcan ME01LK, 6 (15,38%) HCWs fit to RespoKare, 4 (10,26%) fit to 3M 1870 and 3 (7,69%) fit to Dreamcan ME0 12.5. HCWs served in the isolation room for 74,06 28,18 (35-150) minutes. We found a significant difference in heart and respiration rates before entering and after leaving the isolation room (p<0.05). In contradiction, the study showed no difference in O2 saturation (p=0,06).

Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare EpidemiologyVol. 5(S1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Infection Control and Ventilation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.