Hand hygiene compliance from an occupational health perspective - the importance of choosing the right handrub to prevent contact dermatitis

Objectives: Hand hygiene is the cornerstone of infection prevention and control. Factors associated with hand hygiene compliance continues to be a key focus of research today. Choosing the ‘right’ alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) is pivotal in mitigating ICD (irritant contact dermatitis) caused or aggravated by repetitive use of ABHRs. 31% of our healthcare workers (HCW)s reported worsening of their underlying eczema from repetitive use of the incumbent ABHR, whilst 74% experienced either dryness or ICD. In this study, we aim to evaluate two ethanol-based hand rubs against the incumbent hand rub (ethanol and n-propanol mix) to determine if skin tolerability and incidence of ICD can be improved. Methods: 500 HCWs from three departments were invited to participate in a survey to evaluate skin tolerability and user’s acceptability of the 1) incumbent ABHR (i-ABHR) (176 responded) and (2) New ABHR 1 (n-ABHR-1) (147 responded), whilst 190 HCWs from one department were invited to trial 3) New ABHR 2 (n-ABHR-2) (87 responded) using the WHO protocol 1 for handrub evaluation over the course of two weeks for each product respectively. Results: For skin tolerability assessment, only n-ABHR-2 achieved the product acceptability criteria of ≥75% of the participants choosing scale 5 or higher, whereas the other two ABHRs did not. Only 47.7% felt that i-ABHR provided acceptable moisture content. Product acceptability wise, only n-ABHR-2 achieved the acceptable criteria for all measurements. For n-ABHR-1, 45% experienced ICD or dryness, whilst 9% reported worsening of underlying eczema. For n-ABHR 2, 23% reported ICD whilst 1% experienced worsening of underlying eczema. Conclusion: In conclusion, n-ABHR-2 was a more suitable alternative compared to i-ABHR and n-ABHR-1 in terms of acceptability and skin tolerability, particularly for those with underlying eczema. Further investigation is warranted to determine if the low ICD rate could be maintained longer-term to ensure hand hygiene compliance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.156
Primary Topic
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hand hygiene compliance from an occupational health perspective - the importance of choosing the right handrub to prevent contact dermatitis

Thoon Koh Cheng, Stephen Teo
Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
article

Hand hygiene compliance from an occupational health perspective - the importance of choosing the right handrub to prevent contact dermatitis

Thoon Koh Cheng, Stephen Teo
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Hand hygiene is the cornerstone of infection prevention and control. Factors associated with hand hygiene compliance continues to be a key focus of research today. Choosing the ‘right’ alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) is pivotal in mitigating ICD (irritant contact dermatitis) caused or aggravated by repetitive use of ABHRs. 31% of our healthcare workers (HCW)s reported worsening of their underlying eczema from repetitive use of the incumbent ABHR, whilst 74% experienced either dryness or ICD. In this study, we aim to evaluate two ethanol-based hand rubs against the incumbent hand rub (ethanol and n-propanol mix) to determine if skin tolerability and incidence of ICD can be improved. Methods: 500 HCWs from three departments were invited to participate in a survey to evaluate skin tolerability and user’s acceptability of the 1) incumbent ABHR (i-ABHR) (176 responded) and (2) New ABHR 1 (n-ABHR-1) (147 responded), whilst 190 HCWs from one department were invited to trial 3) New ABHR 2 (n-ABHR-2) (87 responded) using the WHO protocol 1 for handrub evaluation over the course of two weeks for each product respectively. Results: For skin tolerability assessment, only n-ABHR-2 achieved the product acceptability criteria of ≥75% of the participants choosing scale 5 or higher, whereas the other two ABHRs did not. Only 47.7% felt that i-ABHR provided acceptable moisture content. Product acceptability wise, only n-ABHR-2 achieved the acceptable criteria for all measurements. For n-ABHR-1, 45% experienced ICD or dryness, whilst 9% reported worsening of underlying eczema. For n-ABHR 2, 23% reported ICD whilst 1% experienced worsening of underlying eczema. Conclusion: In conclusion, n-ABHR-2 was a more suitable alternative compared to i-ABHR and n-ABHR-1 in terms of acceptability and skin tolerability, particularly for those with underlying eczema. Further investigation is warranted to determine if the low ICD rate could be maintained longer-term to ensure hand hygiene compliance.

Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare EpidemiologyVol. 5(S1)
KK Women's and Children's Hospital (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.